Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: a survey of expert centres

Jo, Helen E., Corte, Tamera J., Moodley, Yuben, Levin, Kovi, Westall, Glen, Hopkins, Peter, Chambers, Daniel and Glaspole, Ian (2016) Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: a survey of expert centres. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 16 22: . doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0179-3

Author Jo, Helen E.
Corte, Tamera J.
Moodley, Yuben
Levin, Kovi
Westall, Glen
Hopkins, Peter
Chambers, Daniel
Glaspole, Ian
Title Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: a survey of expert centres
Journal name BMC Pulmonary Medicine   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1471-2466
Publication date 2016-02-01
Year available 2016
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0179-3
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 16
Issue 22
Total pages 6
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher BioMed Central
Collection year 2017
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) are the current "gold standard" in interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis and comprise inter-disciplinary discussion of multiple forms of information to provide diagnostic and management outputs. Although bias could be potentially inserted at any step in the discussion process, to date there has been no consensus regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of MDM. We sought to determine the features of ILD MDMs based within ILD centres of excellence around the world.

Methods: An internet based questionnaire was sent to twelve expert centres in Europe, North America, and Australia seeking information regarding the structure and governance of their MDM. Data was analysed for consistent themes and points of contrast.

Results: Responses were received from 10 out of 12 centres. Similarities were demonstrated with regards to contributing attendees, meeting frequency and case numbers reviewed. Significant heterogeneity in attendee speciality group type, quantity and method of data presentation, approach to diagnosis formulation and documentation, and information provision was apparent.

Conclusions: The constitution of ILD MDMs differs considerably between expert centres. Such differences may result in discordant outcomes, and emphasise the need for further evidence regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of ILD MDMs.
Keyword Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Interstitial lung disease
Multidisciplinary meeting
Idiopathic Pulmonary-Fibrosis
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: HERDC Pre-Audit
Admin Only - School of Medicine
School of Medicine Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 21 Feb 2016, 00:28:01 EST by System User on behalf of Learning and Research Services (UQ Library)