Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health

Wasiak, J., Shen, A. Y., Tan, H. B., Mahar, R., Kan, G., Khoo, W. R. and Faggion, C. M. (2015) Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health. Clinical Oral Investigations, 20 3: 399-431. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1663-5

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Wasiak, J.
Shen, A. Y.
Tan, H. B.
Mahar, R.
Kan, G.
Khoo, W. R.
Faggion, C. M.
Title Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health
Journal name Clinical Oral Investigations   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1436-3771
1432-6981
Publication date 2015-11-20
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1007/s00784-015-1663-5
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 20
Issue 3
Start page 399
End page 431
Total pages 33
Place of publication Heidelberg, Germany
Publisher Springer
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a methodological assessment of paper-based systematic reviews (SR) published in oral health using a validated checklist. A secondary objective was to explore temporal trends on methodological quality.

Material and methods: Two electronic databases (OVID Medline and OVID EMBASE) were searched for paper-based SR of interventions published in oral health from inception to October 2014. Manual searches of the reference lists of paper-based SR were also conducted. Methodological quality of included paper-based SR was assessed using an 11-item questionnaire, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist. Methodological quality was summarized using the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) of the AMSTAR score over different categories and time periods.

Results: A total of 643 paper-based SR were included. The overall median AMSTAR score was 4 (IQR 2–6). The highest median score (5) was found in the pain dentistry and periodontology fields, while the lowest median score (3) was found in implant dentistry, restorative dentistry, oral medicine, and prosthodontics. The number of paper-based SR per year and the median AMSTAR score increased over time (median score in 1990s was 2 (IQR 2–3), 2000s was 4 (IQR 2–5), and 2010 onwards was 5 (IQR 3–6)).

Conclusion: Although the methodological quality of paper-based SR published in oral health has improved in the last few years, there is still scope for improving quality in most evaluated dental specialties.

Clinical relevance: Large-scale assessment of methodological quality of dental SR highlights areas of methodological strengths and weaknesses that can be targeted in future publications to encourage better quality review methodology.
Keyword Dental research
Dentistry
Meta-analysis
Research design
Review
Trends
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Official 2016 Collection
School of Public Health Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 08 Dec 2015, 00:28:43 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service