Think Tanks, 'policy experts' and 'ideas for' education policy making in Australia

Lingard, Bob (2015) Think Tanks, 'policy experts' and 'ideas for' education policy making in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 1-19. doi:10.1007/s13384-015-0193-0

Author Lingard, Bob
Title Think Tanks, 'policy experts' and 'ideas for' education policy making in Australia
Journal name Australian Educational Researcher   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0311-6999
Publication date 2015-11-23
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1007/s13384-015-0193-0
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Start page 1
End page 19
Total pages 19
Place of publication Dordrecht, Netherlands
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted abstract
This paper provides a case study of the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) in Australia with a focus on its education policy work, specifically the report, School funding on a budget (SFoB). CIS is a conservative right wing advocacy think tank, established in 1976 in the aftermath of the Whitlam government’s policy activism, framed by classical liberalism or neoliberalism with a provenance in the political economy of Hayek and Friedman. As such, it is committed to smaller government, individual responsibility and more market driven solutions to social problems. CIS gives more emphasis to academic research than other think tanks of its kind. This paper theorises think tanks as hybrid, boundary spanning organisations that work across academic, media, political and economic fields. An argument is proffered that it is the restructured state, with its loss of research capacity and fast policy making, which has strengthened opportunities for think tank influence across the policy cycle in education. With SFoB, CIS used a political moment, the first Abbott federal government budget focused on ‘budget repair’, to argue a case for reducing government educational expenditure as a percentage of GDP in the long term. That policy moment was used for recommending the abolition of the federal department of education and further dismantling of public schooling. SFoB is shown to be exemplary of the conservative advocacy think tank report genre in its usage of ‘mediatized’ language, surface accoutrements of academic research, and user focus. SFoB is a manifestation of what can be seen as the ideas for policy work of CIS, dressed up as research.
Keyword Think tanks
Ideas for policy
Hybrid organisations
Restructured state
Centre for Independent Studies
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2016 Collection
School of Education Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 04 Dec 2015, 11:36:08 EST by Claire Backhouse on behalf of School of Education