Assessing the structural adequacy of alternative ecohydrological models using a pattern-oriented approach

Arnold, Sven, Attinger, Sabine, Frank, Karin and Hildebrandt, Anke (2015) Assessing the structural adequacy of alternative ecohydrological models using a pattern-oriented approach. Ecological Modelling, 316 52-61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.003

Author Arnold, Sven
Attinger, Sabine
Frank, Karin
Hildebrandt, Anke
Title Assessing the structural adequacy of alternative ecohydrological models using a pattern-oriented approach
Journal name Ecological Modelling   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0304-3800
Publication date 2015-11-24
Year available 2015
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.003
Open Access Status Not Open Access
Volume 316
Start page 52
End page 61
Total pages 10
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted abstract
The development of environmental system models is challenging because of different disciplinary philosophical approaches to uncertainty in modelling of the terrestrial hydrosphere and ecosphere. We use pattern-oriented modelling to assess model structural adequacy and to select alternative model structures within the hierarchy of a model of flood-groundwater–vegetation interactions. We varied the equation structure of two key model components, flood tolerance and seasonal leaf shedding, and tested how well the model structures reproduced a set of observed patterns: (i) three species coexistence, (ii) species-specific access to groundwater, and (iii) species-specific ability to tolerate flood disturbances. We assessed (a) the role of flood frequency in biomass regulation for modelling of three coexisting species sharing the same water resources, and (b) the effect of alternative process and equation structures on the deviation of hydrological variables (transpiration, groundwater table) from average conditions.

Only model structures that explicitly considered the functional relationship between flood events and biomass regulation were able to reproduce the coexistence pattern and the two secondary patterns (ii and iii). The different coexistence mechanisms had little effect on the average transpiration rates and water table depths. However, shallow and deep average groundwater tables, caused by low and high transpiration rates, were modelled more frequently with model structures that intentionally ignored species-specific phenological cycles rather than models which incorporated them. Our findings indicate that, amongst all tested model structures, the most complex one is most plausible and can explain the observed patterns in an environment controlled by the interplay between periods of water deficit and flood disturbance. It reproduced the three observed ecological patterns and enhanced the general understanding of groundwater-dependent ecosystems along ephemeral rivers.
Keyword Pattern-oriented modelling (POM)
Species coexistence
Groundwater-dependent ecosystem
Model structural analysis
Kuiseb River
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2016 Collection
Sustainable Minerals Institute Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 31 Aug 2015, 14:59:08 EST by Dr Sven Arnold on behalf of Centre for Water in the Minerals Industry