The post-2015 global development agenda: a critical analysis

Svizzero, Serge and Tisdell, Clement (2016) The post-2015 global development agenda: a critical analysis. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4 1: 72-94.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ367343_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 126.10KB 0
Author Svizzero, Serge
Tisdell, Clement
Title The post-2015 global development agenda: a critical analysis
Journal name Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 2329-4175
Publication date 2016-09-15
Year available 2015
Sub-type Article (original research)
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 4
Issue 1
Start page 72
End page 94
Total pages 23
Place of publication New York, United States
Publisher Addleton Academic Publishers
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Abstract This paper provides a critical analysis of the post-2015 global development agenda that the international community plans to adopt. This agenda, produced by a high-level panel of eminent persons, is based on two previous agendas – the MDGs and the SDGs. This merger is motivated by similarities in their goals, interdependence between some of their goals, and the need for improved global governance, especially with respect to global public goods. However both agendas are ill-defined and a gap exists between ends and means. The new unique agenda has numerous and varied goals which are potentially in conflict. Furthermore, the world has changed a lot since 2000 and this necessitates a change in the global development agenda. Globally there have been growing economic and social inequalities, considerable population growth and the rise of emerging economies. Subjects of increasing concern include climate change, and other environmental and sustainability issues. These need to be given greater attention in any new economic and/or political agenda than previously. It is argued that developed countries might face a dilemma between altruistic aid policies and tied aid to encourage transformation towards a green economy. Despite its shortcomings, it can be argued that the new agenda provides scope for political compromise and flexibility. This is rational if a wide view of rationality is adopted.
Keyword Millennium development goals
Sustainable development goals
Global public goods
Coordination failures
Collective action
Tied aid
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2016 Collection
School of Economics Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 14:20:27 EST by Emeritus Professor Clement Tisdell on behalf of School of Economics