A comparison of methods for measuring the induction time for bubble-particle attachment

Verrelli, David I. and Albijanic, Boris (2015) A comparison of methods for measuring the induction time for bubble-particle attachment. Minerals Engineering, 80 8-13. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.011

Author Verrelli, David I.
Albijanic, Boris
Title A comparison of methods for measuring the induction time for bubble-particle attachment
Journal name Minerals Engineering   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0892-6875
Publication date 2015-09
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.011
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 80
Start page 8
End page 13
Total pages 6
Place of publication Kidlington, Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher Pergamon Press
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Froth flotation is an exceedingly complex physicochemical process. The convenience of distilling much of the complexity of the particle–bubble interactions into a single parameter has led to the continuing popularity of the classical ‘induction time’ to quantify the threshold for particle–bubble attachment to occur. Despite this popularity and the simplicity of the concept, there is no single universal method of evaluating the induction period.

In this paper, we begin with a critical review of the available techniques for estimating the induction period. These are: back-calculation from experimental (micro)flotation tests; pushing a particle toward a stationary bubble (or vice versa) using an atomic force microscope (AFM); pushing a bubble toward a stationary bed of particles in the ‘Induction Timer’; pushing a bubble toward a stationary solid surface using the ‘integrated thin film drainage apparatus’ (ITFDA); and dropping particles onto a submerged stationary bubble using the ‘Milli-Timer’ device. Each one of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice depends on the application.

In the experimental section, we present quantitative comparison of the induction periods estimated using two different techniques, namely the Induction Timer and the Milli-Timer. The same particles were tested in each device, under the same conditions. It was found that by tuning the operation of the particle pick-up device, similar estimates of induction period could be obtained to the estimates made by direct observation with the Milli-Timer. In the former device a bubble is driven toward a particle bed at a controlled rate, whereas in the latter a particle’s motion is governed by the hydrodynamics. The potential to match these presents an intriguing prospect for better understanding the bubble–particle interaction, and the possibility to ‘calibrate’ the simpler Induction Timer against direct observations.
Keyword Calibration
Induction period
Induction timer
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre Publications
Official 2016 Collection
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 3 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 21 Jul 2015, 00:20:26 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service