Prioritizing localized management actions for seagrass conservation and restoration using a species distribution model

Adams, Matthew P., Saunders, Megan I., Maxwell, Paul S., Tuazon, Daniel, Roelfsema, Chris M., Callaghan, David P., Leon, Javier, Grinham, Alistair R. and O'Brien, Katherine R. (2016) Prioritizing localized management actions for seagrass conservation and restoration using a species distribution model. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 26 639-659. doi:10.1002/aqc.2573


Author Adams, Matthew P.
Saunders, Megan I.
Maxwell, Paul S.
Tuazon, Daniel
Roelfsema, Chris M.
Callaghan, David P.
Leon, Javier
Grinham, Alistair R.
O'Brien, Katherine R.
Title Prioritizing localized management actions for seagrass conservation and restoration using a species distribution model
Journal name Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1052-7613
1099-0755
Publication date 2016
Year available 2015
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1002/aqc.2573
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 26
Start page 639
End page 659
Total pages 21
Place of publication Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Publisher John Wiley and Sons
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Seagrass habitat is globally threatened from the cumulative impact of human activities on coastal ecosystems. Successful conservation and restoration of seagrass requires knowledge of the environmental factors that limit seagrass presence; however, quantifying the relative importance of these environmental factors is a significant challenge.

To resolve this issue, a species distribution model (SDM) for seagrass was constructed from a range of data collected at different spatial and temporal resolutions in Moreton Bay, Australia. Mean annual benthic light availability, significant wave height, and sediment settling time (calculated from sediment size distribution) were the environmental factors predicting seagrass presence in the model, which was calibrated and validated using maps of seagrass cover from 2004 and 2011, respectively.

The SDM correctly classified seagrass presence/absence in 85% of cases for calibration to 2004 data and 88% of cases for validation to 2011 data.

Application of the SDM to 12 regions of 10–100 km2 size within the study area demonstrated that the environmental factors limiting seagrass presence (i.e. either threatening seagrass that is present or hindering its colonization if seagrass is absent) varied substantially between these regions. For example, seagrass presence in the regions Waterloo Bay and Central West was predicted to be limited by their high mud content, while in the region Deception Bay South, light availability was the major limiting factor.

The results demonstrate that SDMs need to be developed on a sufficiently broad scale to capture significant variability in environmental conditions. These models can then be applied at finer scales to assess management options based on the local environmental conditions.
Keyword Coastal
Seagrass meadow
Modelling
Restoration
Habitat management
Vegetation
Macrophytes
Sedimentation
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes In Press

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 12 Jul 2015, 23:22:17 EST by Matthew Adams on behalf of School of Chemical Engineering