How should housing densities be determined: A comparative analysis of Brisbane and Copenhagen

Bamford, Greg (2006). How should housing densities be determined: A comparative analysis of Brisbane and Copenhagen. In: Patrick Troy, State of Australian Cities National Conference 2005. State of Australian Cities National Conference 05. 2nd Bi-Annual National Conf. on the State of Australian Cities (SOAC), South bank Campus, Qld Conservatorium, Griffith University, (1-16). 30 November - 2 December 2005.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ3644_fulltext.pdf Full text from author application/pdf 163.20KB 151
Author Bamford, Greg
Title of paper How should housing densities be determined: A comparative analysis of Brisbane and Copenhagen
Conference name State of Australian Cities National Conference 05. 2nd Bi-Annual National Conf. on the State of Australian Cities (SOAC)
Conference location South bank Campus, Qld Conservatorium, Griffith University
Conference dates 30 November - 2 December 2005
Proceedings title State of Australian Cities National Conference 2005
Place of Publication Nathan, Brisbane, Australia
Publisher Urban Research Program, Griffith University
Publication Year 2006
Sub-type Fully published paper
Editor Patrick Troy
Volume 2
Start page 1
End page 16
Total pages 16
Language eng
Abstract/Summary Modern urban housing densities, actual or proposed, show enormous variation. 'Broadacre City', Frank Lloyd Wright's proposal from the early 1930s, for example, was several thousand times less dense than the Liverpool docks had been in the middle of the previous century. What housing densities should we aim for? The determinants of housing densities can be thought of as either internal or external to habitation. The former concern the space households acquire or are allocated to satisfy the functions or desires of habitation; the latter are those forces, external to habitation, which influence density, such as the provision of public transport, the profit seeking behavior of developers or government policy to slow urban spread. I begin with some brief reminders of how in the recent past when urban compaction theory or practice has been in the ascendancy (internal) considerations of habitation have not been given due weight. Is this the case again? I compare a sample of higher density housing types and schemes in Brisbane with Copenhagen, a denser city admired by compact city advocates. This comparison produces some surprising results about relative densities and should give us cause to think again about levels of amenity and the usefulness of external space in our higher density housing, whatever our beliefs about the need for such densities.
Subjects 410100 Performing Arts
680201 Housing
1205 Urban and Regional Planning
Keyword Urban housing density
Housing densities compared
Urban compaction theory
Q-Index Code E1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 08 Sep 2006, 07:02:05 EST