Understanding constraints to the transformation rate of global energy infrastructure

Lane, Joe L, Smart, Simon, Schmeda-Lopez, Diego, Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove, Garnett, Andrew, Greig, Chris and Mcfarland, Eric (2015) Understanding constraints to the transformation rate of global energy infrastructure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 5 1: 33-48. doi:10.1002/wene.177


Author Lane, Joe L
Smart, Simon
Schmeda-Lopez, Diego
Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove
Garnett, Andrew
Greig, Chris
Mcfarland, Eric
Title Understanding constraints to the transformation rate of global energy infrastructure
Journal name Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 2041-840X
2041-8396
Publication date 2015
Year available 2015
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1002/wene.177
Open Access Status Not yet assessed
Volume 5
Issue 1
Start page 33
End page 48
Total pages 16
Place of publication Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Abstract A massive transformation of the global energy supply system is required if deep reductions in atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions are to be achieved. A top–down review of historical data and energy forecasts provides a perspective on the magnitude of the challenge. Global engineering capability has expanded significantly over the last two decades, accommodating more than 100 GW/year increase in electricity generation infrastructure. However, business-as-usual demand forecasts to 2050 will require more than double the global rates of energy project execution. Transforming to a low-carbon energy supply mix requires 30–70 GW/year of additional infrastructure, due to the increased reliance on intermittent renewables, and the earlier-than-expected replacement of existing coal power plants. Although all power systems share many similar subsystems that will need to be delivered regardless of the technology type, meeting the extra demands for engineering design, construction and/or supply chains may not be possible. The discussion focuses only on physical limitations of electricity generation, specifically around the timing and scale of retiring and/or replacing coal-fired power generation capacity to meet the International Energy Agency's two-degree scenario. We ignore the economics and politics of the transition scenarios and the transformation of the transportation and industrial sectors. What is clear is that the longer the delay in starting a significant transformation, the greater the challenge will become. Decision makers must understand the constraints to technology transitions to deliver effective policy. A broad international consensus is not required, instead reaching agreements and developing economically sustainable pathways to technology transitions in the United States, China, and India is more likely to be successful and the only means for significantly curbing global emissions.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Global Change Institute Publications
School of Chemical Engineering Publications
Official 2016 Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 26 May 2015, 03:11:46 EST by System User on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service