The Gibbs Court

Aroney, Nicholas T. and Patapan, Haig (2015). The Gibbs Court. In Rosalind Dixon and George Williams (Ed.), The High Court, the Constitution and Australian Politics (pp. 220-243) Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107445253.012

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Aroney, Nicholas T.
Patapan, Haig
Title of chapter The Gibbs Court
Title of book The High Court, the Constitution and Australian Politics
Place of Publication Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Publication Year 2015
Sub-type Research book chapter (original research)
DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107445253.012
Year available 2015
ISBN 9781107043664
9781107445253
Editor Rosalind Dixon
George Williams
Chapter number 12
Start page 220
End page 243
Total pages 24
Total chapters 16
Collection year 2016
Language eng
Formatted Abstract/Summary
The High Court under the chief justiceship of Sir Harry Gibbs was distinctive for three important reasons. The first was the consolidation and defence of the integrity of the Court in the context of major challenges to its public reputation. The second concerns the jurisprudential legacy of the Court. The Gibbs Court was important for the way it shaped Australian federalism, with new themes in taxation, environmental, and Indigenous politics providing the context for a reassessment of the powers of the Commonwealth and the states and the constitutional relationship between them. Third, the Court was notable for the emerging variety of judicial techniques and legal philosophies adhered to by its Justices. At the risk of over-simplification, these ranged from the conservative legalism of Gibbs CJ, Sir Keith Aickin, Sir Ronald Wilson, and Sir Daryl Dawson; to the democratic–human rights radicalism of Lionel Murphy J; with the measured and often mediating stances taken by Sir Ninian Stephen and Sir Gerard Brennan; as well as the not yet fully apparent legal realism of Sir Anthony Mason and Sir William Deane, usually lying somewhere in-between. Chief Justice Gibbs played a crucial role in the defence of the Court’s integrity, whereas his views on federalism proved to be less influential. His stance on the constitutionalisation of human rights carried the Court during his leadership, but was eclipsed by the Court under the succeeding Chief Justice, Mason.
Q-Index Code B1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Book Chapter
Collections: Official 2016 Collection
TC Beirne School of Law Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 26 Mar 2015, 12:03:29 EST by Claire Lam on behalf of T.C. Beirne School of Law