Attentional control: the role of task-expectations in determining attentional selection

Retell, James (2015). Attentional control: the role of task-expectations in determining attentional selection PhD Thesis, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland. doi:10.14264/uql.2015.450

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
s4055328_phd_submission.pdf Thesis (open access) application/pdf 1.03MB 367

Author Retell, James
Thesis Title Attentional control: the role of task-expectations in determining attentional selection
School, Centre or Institute School of Psychology
Institution The University of Queensland
DOI 10.14264/uql.2015.450
Publication date 2015-04-10
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Open Access Status Other
Supervisor Roger Remington
Stefanie Becker
Total pages 175
Language eng
Subjects 1701 Psychology
1109 Neurosciences
1702 Cognitive Sciences
Formatted abstract
   The human cognitive system is severely capacity limited. As such, only a select subset of visual input to the retina is fully processed by the cognitive system at any one point in time. To compensate, mechanisms of visual attention allow us to distribute these limited resources throughout the visual field according to properties of the visual input and our goals and intentions. Establishing the exact criteria by which visual input is selected to undergo further processing is central to understanding the processes that determine visual selection; processes that ultimately contribute to our conscious experience of the world. In this thesis, I focus on stimulus novelty and the role that task-expectancies play in determining visual selection. It is well documented that that which is new and unexpected often appears to standout in the environment and can attract visual attention (Horstmann, 2005; Meyer, Niepel, Rudolph & Sch┼▒tzwohl, 1991; Ranganath & Rainer, 2003; Yantis & Jonides 1990). However, the conditions under which this is the case and the mechanism by which we come to be sensitive to novel stimuli require some elucidation.

   Here I present 3 empirical chapters that explore the conditions under which novel and unexpected stimuli attract visual attention. In Chapter 2, I investigated whether attentional capture by unexpected stimuli reflects a form of stimulus driven capture and occurs contrary to the immediate goals on an observer. Across a series of experiments I found that an infrequent (~3-6% of trials) and irrelevant motion cue captured attention when observers had an active set for a specific target color. Critically, this effect was not observed when the same motion stimulus was presented frequently. Thus, task goals appear to modulate capture by stimuli that broadly conform to contextual expectations, while stimuli that violate these expectations appear to guide visual attention involuntarily.

   In chapter 3, I examined what it means for a stimulus to be ‘unexpected’. The first presentation of an unexpected stimulus during visual search has been associated with large RT cost. In chapter 3, I independently varied prior exposure to an unexpected and irrelevant motion distractor and explicit knowledge of its occurrence to assess the contributions of each of these factors in determining the unexpectedness of the stimulus. Neither prior exposure, nor knowledge of occurrence served to attenuate the response to the unexpected motion distractor. These results suggest that the task expectations, which deviant stimuli are evaluated against, are highly context specific and derived from a process of implicit learning about stimulus relevance, and are a not shaped by explicit top-down knowledge about the likelihood of occurrence. In Chapter 4, I examined the time-course of attention shifts to unexpected stimuli. Previous authors (e.g., Horstmann, 2005; 2006) have made the claim that shifts of attention to unexpected stimuli are delayed relative to expected stimuli and that this may suggest a dedicated orienting system for novel and unexpected events.

   In Chapter 4, I used eye-movements as a proxy for attentional selection to evaluate this claim. Across two experiments I found oculomotor capture by an unannounced colour singleton that was rapid, and large RT costs that emerged once the eyes selected the unexpected colour singleton, but not before. This pattern of eye-movements and RT costs is not consistent with accounts that posit a delay in orienting to explain performance decrements that have been associated with unexpected stimuli. I propose an interference account whereby attention is deployed rapidly to an unexpected stimulus and performance decrements reflect the engagement of decision level processes that are recruited to resolve expectation violations.

   In summary, I present 3 empirical chapters that show consistent effects of stimulus novelty on search performance. Based on these results I have proposed that the attentional set reflects a set of contextually specific expectations that describe both the target defining properties and the to-be-ignored properties of distractors. Sensitivity to stimulus novelty is born of a process whereby salient irrelevant stimuli are inhibited over repeated and frequent exposure in order to be ignored. Stimuli that occur infrequently cannot be inhibited and consequently capture visual attention.
Keyword Visual search
Visual attention
Surprise capture
Spatial cueing
Attentional capture
Rare singleton capture
Oculomotor capture

Document type: Thesis
Collections: UQ Theses (RHD) - Official
UQ Theses (RHD) - Open Access
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 23 Mar 2015, 12:31:50 EST by James Retell on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service