Essays on financial risk management

Bu, Di (2015). Essays on financial risk management PhD Thesis, School of Business, The University of Queensland. doi:10.14264/uql.2015.338

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
s42826282_phd_submission.pdf Thesis (open access) application/pdf 1.47MB 142
Author Bu, Di
Thesis Title Essays on financial risk management
School, Centre or Institute School of Business
Institution The University of Queensland
DOI 10.14264/uql.2015.338
Publication date 2015-02-13
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Open Access Status Other
Supervisor Tom Smith
Total pages 114
Language eng
Subjects 150202 Financial Econometrics
150205 Investment and Risk Management
150201 Finance
Formatted abstract
In the lead up to the Global Financial Crisis, the development of financial markets largely brought benefits to the community, but also brought with it significant risks. Risk management in financial markets has consequently become a growing concern for most financial institutions and governments.

A sound risk management system is important to both financial institutions and governments. This thesis consists of three essays that contribute to the literature on risk management, specifically, in the area of corporate credit risk prediction. The first essay relaxes the constant volatility assumption in Merton’s structural model to develop a stochastic volatility (SV) structural credit risk model. The SV structural model is evaluated by comparing with the Merton model in terms of their credit spread predictions through a Monte Carlo study and an analysis based on empirical data of the Down Jones firms. The simulation study verifies the better performance of SV model than Merton model when the asset returns actually have a stochastic volatility. The empirical analysis ascertains the importance of recognizing the stochastic property of the asset return’s volatility in the credit risk prediction, by showing that the SV structural model predicts the actual Credit Default Swap (CDS) spread better than the Merton model.

The second essay, motivated by the importance of the jump process in stock returns, examines the impact of allowing for jumps in the Stochastic Volatility (SV) structural model on corporate credit risk prediction. Bates (1996) model is employed as an example of the Stochastic Volatility and Jumps (SVJ) structural model to describe the evolution of the asset returns. The empirical analysis ascertains the importance of recognizing the jumps in the SV structural model by showing that on average the SVJ model raises the credit risk spread prediction from the Merton structural model and SV model by 6.5 basis points and 2.5 basis points in the Dow Jones firms and 8 basis points and 3 basis points in 200 CRSP firms respectively. This helps explain up to 8% and 10% of the time-variation in actual credit spreads.

Despite both the SV and SVJ model significantly improving CDS spread prediction, the empirical evidence suggests that the superior performance is not constant throughout the sample period. Model uncertainty and instability seriously impair the prediction ability of these models, especially when the model is misspecified. In essay three, we consider three alternative structural models including the Merton model, a structural model with stochastic volatility (SV) and a structural model with stochastic volatility and jumps (SVJ). To mitigate this prediction problem we propose a bias-corrected global minimum variance (GMV) combined forecast procedure. We illustrate the proposed method using both a simulation study and an empirical analysis of the Dow Jones firms in order to further improve CDS spread prediction. Both simulation and empirical results show that the optimal combination significantly improves CDS spread prediction.
Keyword Credit risk
CDS spread
Merton model
Stochastic volatility
Jumps
Model uncertainty
Combined forecasts

Document type: Thesis
Collections: UQ Theses (RHD) - Official
UQ Theses (RHD) - Open Access
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sat, 24 Jan 2015, 15:04:59 EST by Di Bu on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service