Round-robin study of a priori modelling predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One

Rein, Guillermo, Torero, Jose L., Jahn, Wolfram, Stern-Gottfried, Jamie, Ryder, Noah L., Desanghere, Sylvain, Lazaro, Maria, Mowrer, Frederic, Coles, Andrew, Joyeux, Daniel, Alvear, Daniel, Capote, Jorge A., Jowsey, Allan, Abecassis-Empis, Cecilia and Reszka, Pedro (2009) Round-robin study of a priori modelling predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One. Fire Safety Journal, 44 4: 590-602. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.12.008

Author Rein, Guillermo
Torero, Jose L.
Jahn, Wolfram
Stern-Gottfried, Jamie
Ryder, Noah L.
Desanghere, Sylvain
Lazaro, Maria
Mowrer, Frederic
Coles, Andrew
Joyeux, Daniel
Alvear, Daniel
Capote, Jorge A.
Jowsey, Allan
Abecassis-Empis, Cecilia
Reszka, Pedro
Title Round-robin study of a priori modelling predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One
Formatted title
Round-robin study of a priori modelling predictions of the Dalmarnock Fire Test One
Journal name Fire Safety Journal   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0379-7112
Publication date 2009-05
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.12.008
Open Access Status
Volume 44
Issue 4
Start page 590
End page 602
Total pages 13
Place of publication Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher Pergamon
Abstract An international study of fire modelling was conducted prior to the Dalmarnock Fire Test One in order to assess the state-of-the-art of fire simulations using a round-robin approach. This test forms part of the Dalmarnock Fire Tests, a series of experiments conducted in 2006 in a high-rise building. The philosophy behind the tests was to provide measurements in a realistic fire scenario involving multiple fuel packages and non-trivial fire growth, and with an instrumentation density suitable for comparison with computational fluid dynamics models. Each of the seven round-robin teams independently simulated the test scenario a priori using a common detailed description of the compartment geometry, fuel packages, ignition source and ventilation conditions. The aim of the exercise was to forecast the fire development as accurately as possible and compare the results. The aim was not to provide an engineering analysis with conservative assumptions or safety factors. Comparison of the modelling results shows a large scatter and considerable disparity among the predictions, and between predictions and experimental measurements. The scatter of the simulations is much larger than the error and variability expected in the experiments. The study emphasises on the inherent difficulty of modelling fire dynamics in complex fire scenarios like Dalmarnock, and shows that the accuracy to predict fire growth (i.e. evolution of the heat released rate) is, in general, poor.
Keyword Blind
Fire modelling
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Civil Engineering Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 28 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 46 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 08 Aug 2014, 10:01:43 EST by Julie Hunter on behalf of School of Civil Engineering