Holiness, ethics and ritual in Leviticus

Trevaskis, Leigh M. Holiness, ethics and ritual in Leviticus. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2011.

Author Trevaskis, Leigh M.
Title Holiness, ethics and ritual in Leviticus
Place of Publication Sheffield, UK
Publisher Sheffield Phoenix Press
Publication year 2011
Sub-type Research book (original research)
Open Access Status
Volume 29
Series Hebrew Bible Monographs
ISBN 9781906055981
190605598X
ISSN 1747–9614
Language eng
Total number of pages 289
Formatted Abstract/Summary
In this book, Trevaskis argues that holiness in Leviticus always has an ethical dimension, and is not simply a cultic category. In so doing he departs from the usual view that in Leviticus 1–16 (P) holiness is largely a cultic concept.
Biblical scholars have commonly read ritual texts as practical instruction or prescription, inferring the theological significance of the rituals from elsewhere. For example, theological interpretations of the ‘burnt offering’ have been derived from its use in narrative settings (e.g. Gen. 8:20; 22:13) rather than from its legal prescription in Leviticus 1.

Trevaskis, however, argues that an implicit command to be holy exists within some ritual texts in Leviticus, which are more than mere ritual prescriptions. It is in the symbolic dimensions of the rituals that the theological significance lies. In support of this argument, he undertakes exegetical studies of the ‘burnt offering’ (Leviticus 1), of the ‘purity regulations’ (Leviticus 11–15) and of the physical appearance of priests and sacrificial animals (Leviticus 21–22). These studies take place within a methodological framework that avoids capricious symbolic interpretations. Trevaskis draws on cognitive linguistic insights to discern when a text may allude to other texts within the Pentateuch (especially Genesis 1–3), and attends to the legislator’s use of various rhetorical devices (e.g. ‘rhetorical progression’).

Since the command to ‘be holy’ in Leviticus 17–26 (H) only makes explicit what P leaves implicit in Leviticus 1–16, this study has important implications for the compositional history of Leviticus. It becomes much less clear that H’s ethical view of holiness developed from a prophetic critique of P (as Milgrom and Knohl, for example, argue).
Keyword Holiness
Ethics
Symbolism
Priestly literature
Sacrifice
Ritual texts
Purity texts
Food laws
Q-Index Code A1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Book
Collection: School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 02 Jun 2014, 10:30:45 EST by Leigh Trevaskis on behalf of School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry