A comparison of trapping methods for Tabanidae (Diptera) in North Queensland, Australia

Van Hennekeler, K., Jones, R. E., Skerratt, L. F., Fitzpatrick, L. A., Reid, S. A. and Bellis, G. A. (2008) A comparison of trapping methods for Tabanidae (Diptera) in North Queensland, Australia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 22 1: 26-31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00707.x


Author Van Hennekeler, K.
Jones, R. E.
Skerratt, L. F.
Fitzpatrick, L. A.
Reid, S. A.
Bellis, G. A.
Title A comparison of trapping methods for Tabanidae (Diptera) in North Queensland, Australia
Journal name Medical and Veterinary Entomology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0269-283X
1365-2915
Publication date 2008
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00707.x
Open Access Status
Volume 22
Issue 1
Start page 26
End page 31
Total pages 6
Place of publication Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Language eng
Abstract The ability to monitor the abundance and diversity of tabanid flies over wide areas requires effective and low-cost surveillance methods. Such monitoring activities help to quantify the risk of transmission of pathogens by tabanids. Here we examine the effectiveness and practicality of two types of trap (canopy traps and Nzi traps) and two types of attractant (octenol and carbon dioxide) for monitoring tabanid flies in tropical Australia. The Nzi trap consistently caught more tabanids and more species of tabanids than the canopy trap. It was also more robust and therefore required less maintenance in remote locations. The use of attractants substantially increased capture rates, both of individuals and species, and traps using both attractants were consistently the most effective. However, in remote locations, where it is not possible to check traps frequently, the use of attractants may not be feasible. When attractants were not used, the canopy trap caught very few tabanids, but the Nzi trap remained effective enough to be useful as a monitoring device. In addition, the number of tabanid species caught by the Nzi traps remained high, and included those that were most abundant. We therefore conclude that, in this region, Nzi traps are preferable for tabanid monitoring and that attractants greatly improve their effectiveness. However, for longterm monitoring, especially in remote locations, Nzi traps without attractants are a satisfactory option.
Keyword Australia
Canopy
Carbon dioxide
Nzi
Octenol
Remote locations
Tabanidae
Vectors
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Public Health Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 17 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 16 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 20 May 2014, 10:57:47 EST by System User on behalf of School of Public Health