Exploring the population-level impact of antiretroviral treatment: the influence of baseline intervention context

Mishra, Sharmistha, Mountain, Elisa, Pickles, Michael, Vickerman, Peter, Shastri, Suresh, Gilks, Charles, Dhingra, Nandini K., Washington, Reynold, Becker, Marissa L., Blanchard, James F., Alary, Michel and Boily, Marie-Claude (2014) Exploring the population-level impact of antiretroviral treatment: the influence of baseline intervention context. AIDS, 28 SUPPL. 1: S61-S72. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000109


Author Mishra, Sharmistha
Mountain, Elisa
Pickles, Michael
Vickerman, Peter
Shastri, Suresh
Gilks, Charles
Dhingra, Nandini K.
Washington, Reynold
Becker, Marissa L.
Blanchard, James F.
Alary, Michel
Boily, Marie-Claude
Title Exploring the population-level impact of antiretroviral treatment: the influence of baseline intervention context
Journal name AIDS   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0269-9370
1473-5571
Publication date 2014-01-01
Year available 2014
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000109
Volume 28
Issue SUPPL. 1
Start page S61
End page S72
Total pages 12
Place of publication Philadelphia PA, United States
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Collection year 2015
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Objective: To compare the potential population-level impact of expanding antiretroviral treatment (ART) in HIV epidemics concentrated among female sex workers (FSWs) and clients, with and without existing condom-based FSW interventions.

Design: Mathematical model of heterosexual HIV transmission in south India.

Methods: We simulated HIV epidemics in three districts to assess the 10-year impact of existing ART programs (ART eligibility at CD4+ cell count <350) beyond that achieved with high condom use, and the incremental benefit of expanding ART by either increasing ART eligibility, improving access to care, or prioritizing ART expansion to FSWs/clients. Impact was estimated in the total population (including FSWs and clients).

Results: In the presence of existing condom-based interventions, existing ART programs (medium-to-good coverage) were predicted to avert 11–28% of remaining HIV infections between 2014 and 2024. Increasing eligibility to all risk groups prevented an incremental 1–15% over existing ART programs, compared with 29–53% when maximizing access to all risk groups. If there was no condom-based intervention, and only poor ART coverage, then expanding ART prevented a larger absolute number
but a smaller relative fraction of HIV infections for every additional person-year of ART. Across districts and baseline interventions, for every additional person-year of treatment, prioritizing access to FSWs was most efficient (and resource saving), followed by prioritizing access to FSWs and clients.

Conclusion: The relative and absolute benefit of ART expansion depends on baseline condom use, ART coverage, and epidemic size. In south India, maximizing FSWs’ access to care, followed by maximizing clients’ access are the most efficient ways to
expand ART for HIV prevention, across baseline intervention context.
Keyword Antiretroviral treatment
Condom use
Female sex worker
HIV prevention
HIV transmission
India
Mathematical model
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2015 Collection
School of Public Health Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 04 Mar 2014, 10:38:47 EST by System User on behalf of School of Public Health