Psychometric validation of the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) applied with Indigenous Australians

Haswell, Melissa R., Kavanagh, David, Tsey, Komla, Reilly, Lyndon, Cadet-James, Yvonne, Laliberte, Arlene, Wilson, Andrew and Doran, Chris (2010) Psychometric validation of the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) applied with Indigenous Australians. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44 9: 791-799. doi:10.3109/00048674.2010.482919

Author Haswell, Melissa R.
Kavanagh, David
Tsey, Komla
Reilly, Lyndon
Cadet-James, Yvonne
Laliberte, Arlene
Wilson, Andrew
Doran, Chris
Title Psychometric validation of the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) applied with Indigenous Australians
Journal name Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0004-8674
Publication date 2010-09
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.3109/00048674.2010.482919
Open Access Status
Volume 44
Issue 9
Start page 791
End page 799
Total pages 9
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher Sage
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Objective: Empowerment is a complex process of psychological, social, organizational and structural change. It allows individuals and groups to achieve positive growth and effectively address the social and psychological impacts of historical oppression, marginalization and disadvantage. The Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) was developed to measure change in dimensions of empowerment as defined and described by Aboriginal Australians who participated in the Family Well Being programme.

The GEM has two components: a 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale (EES14) and 12 Scenarios (12S). It is accompanied by the Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6), supplemented by two questions assessing frequency of happy and angry feelings. For validation, the measure was applied with 184 Indigenous Australian participants involved in personal and/or organizational social health activities.

Psychometric analyses of the new instruments support their validity and reliability and indicate two-component structures for both the EES (Self-capacity; Inner peace) and the 12S (Healing and enabling growth, Connection and purpose). Strong correlations were observed across the scales and subscales. Participants who scored higher on the newly developed scales showed lower distress on the K6, particularly when the two additional questions were included. However, exploratory factor analyses demonstrated that GEM subscales are separable from the Kessler distress measure.

The GEM shows promise in enabling measurement and enhancing understanding of both process and outcome of psychological and social empowerment within an Australian Indigenous context.
Keyword Aboriginal
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Medicine Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 18 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 27 Nov 2013, 13:49:12 EST by System User on behalf of School of Medicine