Sexual regret: evidence for evolved sex differences

Galperin, Andrew, Haselton, Martie G., Frederick, David A., Poore, Joshua, von Hippel, William, Buss, David M. and Gonzaga, Gian C. (2013) Sexual regret: evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42 7: 1145-1161. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0019-3

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Galperin, Andrew
Haselton, Martie G.
Frederick, David A.
Poore, Joshua
von Hippel, William
Buss, David M.
Gonzaga, Gian C.
Title Sexual regret: evidence for evolved sex differences
Journal name Archives of Sexual Behavior   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0004-0002
1573-2800
Publication date 2013-10
Year available 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-0019-3
Open Access Status
Volume 42
Issue 7
Start page 1145
End page 1161
Total pages 17
Place of publication New York, United States
Publisher Springer
Collection year 2014
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Regret and anticipated regret enhance decision quality by helping people avoid making and repeating mistakes. Some of people’s most intense regrets concern sexual decisions. We hypothesized evolved sex differences in women’s and men’s experiences of sexual regret. Because of women’s higher obligatory costs of reproduction throughout evolutionary history, we hypothesized that sexual actions, particularly those involving casual sex, would be regretted more intensely by women than by men. In contrast, because missed sexual opportunities historically carried higher reproductive fitness costs for men than for women, we hypothesized that poorly chosen sexual inactions would be regretted more by men than by women. Across three studies (Ns = 200, 395, and 24,230), we tested these hypotheses using free responses, written scenarios, detailed checklists, and Internet sampling to achieve participant diversity, including diversity in sexual orientation. Across all data sources, results supported predicted psychological sex differences and these differences were localized in casual sex contexts. These findings are consistent with the notion that the psychology of sexual regret was shaped by recurrent sex differences in selection pressures operating over deep time.
Keyword Evolutionary psychology
Sex differences
Parental investment theory
Sexual regret
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Published online 21 November 2012

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2014 Collection
School of Psychology Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 17 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 17 Nov 2013, 00:11:04 EST by System User on behalf of School of Psychology