Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia

Hollingworth, Samantha A., Symons, Martyn, Khatun, Mohsina, Loveday, Bill, Ballantyne, Sue, Hall, Wayne D. and Najman, Jake M. (2013) Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 37 2: 132-138. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12030

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ299802_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 105.21KB 7

Author Hollingworth, Samantha A.
Symons, Martyn
Khatun, Mohsina
Loveday, Bill
Ballantyne, Sue
Hall, Wayne D.
Najman, Jake M.
Title Prescribing databases can be used to monitor trends in opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia
Journal name Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1326-0200
Publication date 2013-04
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12030
Open Access Status File (Author Post-print)
Volume 37
Issue 2
Start page 132
End page 138
Total pages 7
Place of publication Richmond, VIC, Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Collection year 2014
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Objective: There has been increased use of prescription opioid analgesics in Australia in the past 20 years with increasing evidence of related problems. A number of data sources collect information about the dispensed prescribing for opioid medications, but little is known about the extent to which these data sources agree on levels of opioid prescribing.
Methods: In Queensland, all opioid prescriptions (S8 prescriptions) dispensed by community pharmacies must be submitted to the Drugs of Dependence Unit (DDU). This potentially comprises a ‘gold standard’ against which other data sources may be judged. There are two national data sources: the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (PBS) for all medications subsidised by government; and an annual national survey of representative pharmacies, which assesses non-subsidised opioid prescribing. We examined the agreement between these data sources.
Results: The three data sources provided consistent estimates of use over time. The correlations between different data sources were high for most opioid analgesics. There was a substantial (60%) increase in the dispensed use of opioid analgesics and a 180% increase in the dispensed use of oxycodone over the period 2002–2009. Tramadol was the most used opioid-like medication.
Conclusions: Since 2002 different data sources reveal similar trends, namely a substantial increase in the prescribing of opioid medications. With few exceptions, the conclusions derived from using any of these data sources were similar.
Implications: Improved access to PBS data for relevant stakeholders could provide an efficient and cost-effective way to monitor use of prescription opioid analgesics.
Keyword Analgesics
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 4 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 10 May 2013, 18:58:22 EST by System User on behalf of School of Pharmacy