Comparison of serological assays for detecting antibodies in ducks exposed to H5 subtype avian influenza virus

Wibawa, Hendra, Henning, Joerg, Waluyati, Dessie Eri, Usman, Tri Bhakti, Lowther, Sue, Bingham, John, Junaidi, Akhmad and Meers, Joanne (2012) Comparison of serological assays for detecting antibodies in ducks exposed to H5 subtype avian influenza virus. BMC Veterinary Research, 8 117.1-117.9. doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-117

Author Wibawa, Hendra
Henning, Joerg
Waluyati, Dessie Eri
Usman, Tri Bhakti
Lowther, Sue
Bingham, John
Junaidi, Akhmad
Meers, Joanne
Title Comparison of serological assays for detecting antibodies in ducks exposed to H5 subtype avian influenza virus
Journal name BMC Veterinary Research   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1746-6148
Publication date 2012-07
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-8-117
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 8
Start page 117.1
End page 117.9
Total pages 9
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher BioMed Central
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: Chicken red blood cells (RBCs) are commonly used in hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests to measure hemagglutinating antibodies against influenza viruses. The use of horse RBCs in the HI test can reportedly increase its sensitivity when testing human sera for avian influenza antibodies. This study aims to compare the proportion of positives detected and the agreement between two HI tests using either chicken or horse red blood cells for antibody detection in sera of ducks experimentally infected or naturally exposed to Indonesian H5 subtype avian influenza virus. In addition, comparison with a virus neutralisation (VN) test was conducted with the experimental sera.

Results: In the experimental study, the proportion of HI antibody-positive ducks increased slightly, from 0.57 when using chicken RBCs to 0.60 when using horse RBCs. The HI tests indicated almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.86) when results were dichotomised (titre ≥ 4 log2), and substantial agreement (weighted kappa = 0.80) for log titres. Overall agreements between the two HI tests were greater than between either of the HI tests and the VN test. The use of horse RBCs also identified a higher proportion of antibody positives in field duck sera (0.08, compared to chicken RBCs 0.02), with also almost perfect agreements for dichotomized results (Prevalence and bias adjusted Kappa (PABAK) = 0.88) and for log titres (weighted PABAK = 0.93), respectively. Factors that might explain observed differences in the proportion of antibody-positive ducks and in the agreements between HI tests are discussed.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we identified a good agreement between HI tests. However, when horse RBCs were used, a higher proportion of sera was positive (titre ≥ 4 log2) than using chicken RBCs, especially during the early response against H5N1 virus. The HRBC-HI might be more responsive in identifying early H5N1 HPAI serological response and could be a recommended assay for avian influenza sero-surveillance in both wild and domestic birds.
Keyword Avian influenza
Hemagglutination inhibition test
Virus neutralization test
Horse red blood cells
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Article number 117

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Veterinary Science Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 24 Feb 2013, 00:25:29 EST by System User on behalf of School of Veterinary Science