Occupational sitting: practitioner perceptions of health risks, intervention strategies and influences

Gilson, Nicholas, Straker, Leon and Parry, Sharon (2012) Occupational sitting: practitioner perceptions of health risks, intervention strategies and influences. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 23 3: 208-212. doi:10.1071/HE12208

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Gilson, Nicholas
Straker, Leon
Parry, Sharon
Title Occupational sitting: practitioner perceptions of health risks, intervention strategies and influences
Journal name Health Promotion Journal of Australia   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1036-1073
Publication date 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1071/HE12208
Volume 23
Issue 3
Start page 208
End page 212
Total pages 5
Place of publication Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Publisher Australian Health Promotion Association
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Abstract Issue addressed: Workplace practitioners are well placed to provide practical insights on sedentary behaviour issues in the workplace. This study consulted occupational health and safety (OHS) practitioners, examining their perceptions of sedentary health risks and views on strategies and influences to reduce and break prolonged occupational sitting. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with convenience samples of OHS practitioners (n=34; 6 men; 46.4±9.6 years) attending an Australian national conference in November 2010. Open-ended questions concerning health risks, sitting reduction strategies and influences were posed by lead researchers and practitioners invited to express opinions, viewpoints and experiences. Audio-recordings and summary notes of focus group discussions were reviewed by researchers to identify key response themes. Results: OHS practitioners were well informed about the chronic disease and musculoskeletal risks associated with prolonged occupational sitting, but noted the importance of not replacing one workplace health issue (too much sitting) with another (too much standing). Ideas for strategies were diverse and explored the dichotomy between providing choices for employees to stand and move more (e.g. sit-stand desks), as opposed to obligating change through adapting job and office design (e.g. centralising printers and scanners). Productivity concerns were cited as a major influence for change. OHS practitioners also highlighted the value of using cross-disciplinary expertise to bridge the gap between research and practice. Conclusions: This study identified that OHS practitioners in Australia have a good understanding of the risks of prolonged occupational sitting and potential strategies to manage these risks.
Keyword Practitioners
Focus groups
Occupational sitting
Health risks
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 10 Feb 2013, 01:37:55 EST by System User on behalf of School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences