Study protocol: the registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study

Morgan, Simon, Magin, Parker J., Henderson, Kim M., Goode, Susan M., Scott, John, Bowe, Steven J., Regan, Catherine M., Sweeney, Kevin P., Jackel, Julian and van Driel, Mieke L. (2012) Study protocol: the registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study. BMC Family Practice, 13 50.1-50.8. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-50

Author Morgan, Simon
Magin, Parker J.
Henderson, Kim M.
Goode, Susan M.
Scott, John
Bowe, Steven J.
Regan, Catherine M.
Sweeney, Kevin P.
Jackel, Julian
van Driel, Mieke L.
Title Study protocol: the registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study
Journal name BMC Family Practice   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1471-2296
Publication date 2012-06
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-50
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 13
Start page 50.1
End page 50.8
Total pages 8
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher BioMed Central
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: Patient encounters are the core learning activity of Australian general practice (family practice) training. Exposure to patient demographics and presentations may vary from one general practice registrar (vocational trainee) to another. This can affect comprehensiveness of training. Currently, there is no mechanism to systematically capture the content of GP registrar consultations. The aim of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study is to document longitudinally the nature and associations of consultation-based clinical and educational experiences of general practice registrars.

Methods/design: This is an ongoing prospective multi-site cohort study of general practice registrars’ consultations, entailing paper-based recording of consultation data. The study setting is general practices affiliated with three geographically-based Australian general practice regional training providers. Registrars record details of 60 consecutive
consultations. Data collected includes registrar demographics, details of the consultation, patient demographics, reasons for encounter and problems managed. Problems managed are coded with the International Classification of Primary Care (second edition) classification system. Additionally, registrars record educational factors related to the encounter. The study will follow the clinical exposure of each registrar six-monthly over the 18 months to two years (full-time equivalent) of their general practice training program.

Conclusions: The study will provide data on a range of factors (patient, registrar and consultation factors). This data will be used to inform a range of educational decisions as well as being used to answer educational research questions. We plan to use ReCEnT as a formative assessment tool for registrars and help identify and address educational needs. The study will facilitate program evaluation by the participating training providers and thus improve articulation of educational programs with practice experience. From the research point of view it will address an evidence gap – the in-practice clinical and educational experience of general practice trainees, determinants of these experiences, and the determinants of registrars’ patterns of practice (for example, prescribing practice) over the course of their training.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Article 50

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Discipline of General Practice Publications
Official 2013 Collection
School of Medicine Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 19 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 30 Dec 2012, 00:12:43 EST by System User on behalf of School of Medicine