Biological surrogacy in tropical seabed assemblages fails

Sutcliffe, P. R., Pitcher, C. R., Caley, M. J. and Possingham, H. P. (2012) Biological surrogacy in tropical seabed assemblages fails. Ecological Applications, 22 6: 1762-1771. doi:10.1890/11-0990.1

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Sutcliffe, P. R.
Pitcher, C. R.
Caley, M. J.
Possingham, H. P.
Title Biological surrogacy in tropical seabed assemblages fails
Journal name Ecological Applications   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1051-0761
Publication date 2012-09
Year available 2013
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1890/11-0990.1
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 22
Issue 6
Start page 1762
End page 1771
Total pages 10
Place of publication Washington, DC, United States
Publisher Ecological Society of America
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Surrogate taxa are used widely to represent attributes of other taxa for which data are sparse or absent. Because surveying and monitoring marine biodiversity is resource intensive, our understanding and management of marine systems will need to rely on the availability of effective surrogates. The ability of any marine taxon to adequately represent another, however, is largely unknown because there are rarely sufficient data for multiple taxa in the same region(s). Here, we defined a taxonomic group to be a surrogate for another taxonomic group if they possessed similar assemblage patterns. We investigated effects on surrogate performance of (1) grouping species by taxon at various levels of resolution, (2) selective removal of rare species from analysis, and (3) the number of clusters used to define assemblages, using samples for 11 phyla distributed across 1189 sites sampled from the seabed of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. This spatially and taxonomically comprehensive data set provided an opportunity for extensive testing of surrogate performance in a tropical marine system using these three approaches for the first time, as resource and data  constraints were previously limiting. We measured surrogate performance as to how similarly sampling sites were divided into assemblages between taxa. For each  taxonomic group independently, we grouped sites into assemblages using Hellinger distances and medoid clustering. We then used a similarity index to quantify the  concordance of assemblages between all pairs of taxonomic groups. Surrogates performed better when taxa were grouped at a phylum level, compared to taxa  grouped at a finer taxonomic resolution, and were unaffected by the exclusion of spatially rare species. Mean surrogate performance increased as the number of clusters decreased. Moreover, no taxonomic group was a particularly good surrogate  for any other, suggesting that the use of any one (or few) group(s) for mapping seabed biodiversity patterns is imprudent; sampling several taxonomic groups appears to be essential for understanding tropical/subtropical seabed communities. Consequently,  where resource constraints do not allow complete surveying of biodiversity, it may be preferable to exclude rare species to allow investment in a broader range of taxonomic groups.
Keyword Assemblage patterns
Cross-taxon surrogates
Great Barrier Reef
Marine communities
Taxonomic assemblages
Tropical seabed
Cross-Taxon Congruence
Data Set
Species Richness
Marine Reserves
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Biological Sciences Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 15 Nov 2012, 11:36:00 EST by System User on behalf of School of Biological Sciences