Supervision of music therapists: an Australian cross-sectional survey regarding views and practices

Kennelly, Jeanette D., Baker, Felicity A., Morgan, Kylie A. and Daveson, Barbara A. (2012) Supervision of music therapists: an Australian cross-sectional survey regarding views and practices. Australian Journal of Music Therapy, 23 41-56.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ282720_fulltext.pdf UQ282720_fulltext.pdf application/pdf 703.82KB 1
Author Kennelly, Jeanette D.
Baker, Felicity A.
Morgan, Kylie A.
Daveson, Barbara A.
Title Supervision of music therapists: an Australian cross-sectional survey regarding views and practices
Journal name Australian Journal of Music Therapy
ISSN 1036-9457
Publication date 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
Volume 23
Start page 41
End page 56
Total pages 16
Place of publication Malvern, VIC, Australia
Publisher Australian Music Therapy Association
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Background: Music therapy professional organisations regard supervision as important and therapists are often encouraged to use supervision. However, little is known about music therapists ' views and practices of supervision.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the views and practices of Australian-based music therapists regarding supervision.

Method: A cross-sectional on-line survey was conducted with registered music therapists (RMT) practising within Australia. Responses were analysed using descriptive analyses.

Results: A response rate of 19.5% (711360) was achieved. Overall completion rate was 16.3% (59/360). Four sets of respondents were identified, including those who received supervision from a music therapist; from a non-music therapist, from both music therapist and non-music therapist and a substal1fial proportion that did not receive supervision. No significant differences ~0·05) were found between the groups that did and did not access supervision, however differences in costs and location were identified. The majority of those that received supervision (57%) received it from a supervisor not qualified in music therapy. The top three factors used to select a music therapy qualified supervisor were trust and prior knowledge of the supervisor, workplace requirements, and the type of supervision needed. The two highest-ranking reasons for not using supervision were working in a setting where supervision was not needed, and working with a population where supervision was not required.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight a gap between the importance placed on supervision by music therapy professional organisations and what this group of therapists report that they do. Based on our findings, professional guidelines surrounding the practice of professional supervision also need to be reviewed.
Keyword Supervision
Survey
Australia
Music therapy
Best practice
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Music Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 04 Oct 2012, 09:26:05 EST by Dr Felicity Baker on behalf of School of Music