Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research

Alvesson, Mats and Sandberg, Jorgen (2013) Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50 1: 128-152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Alvesson, Mats
Sandberg, Jorgen
Title Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research
Journal name Journal of Management Studies   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0022-2380
1467-6486
Publication date 2013-01
Year available 2012
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 50
Issue 1
Start page 128
End page 152
Total pages 25
Place of publication Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Despite the huge increase in the number of management articles published during the three last decades, there is a serious shortage of high-impact research in management studies. We contend that a primary reason behind this paradoxical shortage is the near total dominance of incremental gap-spotting research in management. This domination is even more paradoxical as it is well known that gap-spotting rarely leads to influential theories. We identify three broad and interacting key drivers behind this double paradox: institutional conditions, professional norms, and researchers' identity constructions. We discuss how specific changes in these drivers can reduce the shortage of influential management theories. We also point to two methodologies that may encourage and facilitate more innovative and imaginative research and revisions of academic norms and identities.
Keyword Interesting theories
Problematization
Research methods
Research problems
Research questions
Theory development
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Article first published online: 3 August 2012.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
UQ Business School Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 66 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 84 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 24 Sep 2012, 15:18:56 EST by Karen Morgan on behalf of UQ Business School