Idealism in the works of Andrei Platonov: idealism as irony and irony as idealism

Lang Broman, Susanne Patricia (2012). Idealism in the works of Andrei Platonov: idealism as irony and irony as idealism MPhil Thesis, School of Language & Comparative Cultural Studies, The University of Queensland.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
n41031511_MPhil_finalthesis.pdf Thesis full text application/pdf 1.01MB 11
Author Lang Broman, Susanne Patricia
Thesis Title Idealism in the works of Andrei Platonov: idealism as irony and irony as idealism
School, Centre or Institute School of Language & Comparative Cultural Studies
Institution The University of Queensland
Publication date 2012
Thesis type MPhil Thesis
Supervisor John McNair
Lyndall Morgan
Total pages 140
Total black and white pages 140
Language eng
Subjects 200509 Central and Eastern European Literature (incl. Russian)
Formatted abstract
This thesis examines the nature and use of irony in the works of Platonov in relation to idealism, as it would be difficult to find in any of his writings an instance of irony that is not, in some way, connected with Soviet idealism. For example, often his response to official idealism is the doubly ironic presentation of his own version of the ideal (such as his outrageous portrayal of the peasant Makar as the ideal socialist, which challenges the regime’s view of the peasant as stupid and backward). The opposition idealism as irony/irony as idealism describes his ironic approach to idealism, and his employment of a dichotomic style in order to convey his dialectical way of thinking.

This thesis largely focuses upon Platonov’s satires and parodies of the 1920s and 1930s, all of which deal with the complex early socialist experience. “Усомнившийся Макар”, for example, serves as a key text, owing to its prominent peasant/official and realism/idealism dichotomies. Чевенгур is also notable for its realism/idealism dichotomy. Cчастливая Москва and “Среди животных и растений” figure prominently, owing to their (respective) ironic depictions of Moskva and Fedorov’s mother as New Soviet Women. Though not a satire or parody, “Электрофикация” also receives mention, because it reveals key elements of Platonov’s worldview. Reference is also made to the novella Джан, a deeply psychological work full of nuance and steeped in eroticism which remains in a category of its own.

In his body of ironic works, Platonov synthesizes the many realities of his compatriots into a coherent whole. This synthesis of difference is made possible by Platonov’s strong belief in inclusiveness, which underlies his work, unifying or cementing together the different elements. He also employs inclusiveness ironically or dialectically, in order to expose its inherent opposite, exclusion, and the estrangement which it engenders.

There is a dynamic dialogue between text and context in the works of Platonov, which highlights the importance of the social, cultural, ideological, political, and historical contexts within which he wrote. I will, therefore, employ a methodological approach based on the investigation of context.
Keyword Andrei Platonov

Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 04 Sep 2012, 17:36:17 EST by Ms Susanne Broman on behalf of Scholarly Communication and Digitisation Service