Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: The Sydney paediatric eye disease study

Leone, J. F., Gole, G. A., Mitchell, P., Kifley, A., Pai, A. S-I and Rose, K. A. (2012) Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: The Sydney paediatric eye disease study. Eye, 26 7: 925-932. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.60


Author Leone, J. F.
Gole, G. A.
Mitchell, P.
Kifley, A.
Pai, A. S-I
Rose, K. A.
Title Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: The Sydney paediatric eye disease study
Journal name Eye   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0950-222X
1476-5454
Publication date 2012-07
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1038/eye.2012.60
Volume 26
Issue 7
Start page 925
End page 932
Total pages 8
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher Nature
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract Purpose: To establish standardised protocols for vision screening, testability and comparability of three different vision tests were examined in a population-based, cross-sectional sample of preschool children (Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study).

Methods: Measurement of presenting monocular distance visual acuity (VA) using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) HOTV protocol, was attempted by all (1774) children aged≥24 months. In addition, in children aged≥60 months (576), VA was also tested using the logMAR retro-illuminated HOTV or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) linear charts (CSV 1000). Children able to have both eyes tested monocularly were considered.

Results: Testability significantly increased with age for all VA tests. The ATS HOTV with an overall testability of 80% (females: 82%, males: 78%) was the most testable of the VA tests (P<0.0001). In children aged <3 years testability was low (≤47%) rising to≥80% in children aged≥3. In children≥60 months, testability was higher for the HOTV (94%) than the ETDRS (59%) chart. In those that did two VA tests, mean difference of the ATS HOTV compared with the HOTV(CSV) was -0.1, and compared with ETDRS was -0.12 (P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Children aged <3 years had poor VA testability, whereas those 3 years and above were highly testable using the ATS HOTV. The HOTV (CSV) retro-illuminated test was appropriate for children aged >5 years, and may be possible in younger children with early educational exposure. When comparing VA measures using these tests, the higher VA attained using the ATS HOTV, needs to be taken into account.
Keyword Visual acuity
Child
Preschool
Vision screening
Cross-sectional studies
Open Access Mandate Compliance Yes - Open Access (Publisher DOI)
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Published online: 13 April 2012.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2013 Collection
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 3 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 41 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Sun, 12 Aug 2012, 00:04:39 EST by System User on behalf of School of Medicine