Exercise testing in asymptomatic patients after revascularization: Are outcomes altered?

Harb, Serge C., Cook, Thomas, Jaber, Wael A. and Marwick, Thomas H. (2012) Exercise testing in asymptomatic patients after revascularization: Are outcomes altered?. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172 11: 854-861. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1355


Author Harb, Serge C.
Cook, Thomas
Jaber, Wael A.
Marwick, Thomas H.
Title Exercise testing in asymptomatic patients after revascularization: Are outcomes altered?
Journal name Archives of Internal Medicine   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0003-9926
1538-3679
Publication date 2012-06
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1355
Volume 172
Issue 11
Start page 854
End page 861
Total pages 8
Place of publication Chicago IL, United States
Publisher American Medical Association
Collection year 2013
Language eng
Formatted abstract Background
Although exercise echocardiography (ExE) of asymptomatic patients early (<2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or <5 years after coronary bypass graft surgery [CABG]) after revascularization is considered inappropriate, the appropriateness of later testing is indeterminate. Treatment responses to positive test results in either setting have uncertain outcome implications. We sought to identify whether predictors of increased risk by ExE could lead to interventions that change outcome in asymptomatic patients with previous coronary revascularization.

Methods
Exercise echocardiography was performed in 2105 asymptomatic patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [10] years; 310 [15%] were women; 845 [40%] had a history of myocardial infarction; 1143 [54%] had undergone PCI and 962 [46%] had undergone CABG 4.1 [4.7] years prior to the ExE). Ischemia was identified as a new or worsening wall motion abnormality. Patients were followed for a mean (SD) period of 5.7 (3.0) years for cardiac mortality. The association of ischemia during ExE with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models, and an interaction with revascularization was sought.

Results
Of 262 patients with ischemia (13%), only 88 (34%) underwent subsequent revascularization. Mortality (97 patients [4.6%]) was associated with ischemia (hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.05-4.19; P = .04) in groups tested both early (P = .03) and late (≥2 years after PCI or ≥ 5 years after CABG) (P = .001). However, the main predictors of outcome were clinical and stress testing findings rather than echocardiographic features. Subgroup analysis showed that asymptomatic patients without diabetes mellitus, with normal ejection fraction (≥50%), and normal exercise capacity (>6 METs [metabolic equivalent for task]) were unlikely to have a positive test result or events. Even high-risk patients did not seem to benefit from repeated revascularization.

Conclusions
Asymptomatic patients who undergo ExE after coronary revascularization may be identified as being at high risk but do not seem to have more favorable outcomes with repeated revascularization. From a health economic standpoint, appropriateness of such testing must be carefully reviewed.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Non HERDC
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 12 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 15 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 35 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 06 Jul 2012, 13:27:09 EST by Matthew Lamb on behalf of School of Medicine