The role of reward in awarded attention

Ashleigh Kunde (2011). The role of reward in awarded attention Honours Thesis, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
KundeAshleigh4071thesis2011.pdf KundeAshleigh4071thesis2011 Click to show the corresponding preview/stream application/pdf 1.55MB 7
Author Ashleigh Kunde
Thesis Title The role of reward in awarded attention
School, Centre or Institute School of Psychology
Institution The University of Queensland
Publication date 2011-10-12
Thesis type Honours Thesis
Supervisor Professor Roger Remington
Total pages 71
Language eng
Subjects 1701 Psychology
Abstract/Summary Attending to visual stimuli associated with a high probability of procuring rewards is greatly adaptive. Exactly how reward interacts to guide visual attention is presently unclear. Currently, there are two generally accepted modes of attentional control: top-down mechanisms that allocate attention in keeping with task goals, and bottom-up mechanisms that are driven involuntarily by physically salient stimuli. Past research has supported the notion that reward enhances top-down processing by increasing motivation. In contrast, recent research has found evidence suggesting that the effect of reward on attention is independent of both top-down and bottom-up processing. Specifically, a non-salient and irrelevant stimulus that was associated with a high reward in a previous visual search task, was found to capture attention in a separate task using the same paradigm (Anderson, Laurent and Yantis, 2011). This capture was robust even when it resulted in considerable costs to current task goals. From these findings, a third value-driven model of attention has since been proposed. The current study aimed to replicate and extend these findings. Experiment 1 examined whether stimulus-value associations learned in a visual search task, would influence performance in a subsequent spatial cueing task. The aim was to investigate whether value learning was attached to objects (object hypthesis), or contexts (context hypothesis) by assessing value effects across paradigms. Experiment 2 aimed to further explore how value attaches to stimuli, by examining whether features are only rewarded if they are part of the attentional search set (explicit-reward hypothesis), or if reward attaches to all features of an attended object (implicit-reward hypothesis). High-value cues were found to elicit a significant cueing effect across both experiments, hence lending support to both the object hypothesis and the implicit-reward hypothesis.
Keyword Role of reward
Attentional control

Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 72 Abstract Views, 7 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 19 Jun 2012, 14:42:05 EST by Mrs Ann Lee on behalf of School of Psychology