Improving biodiversity monitoring

Lindenmayer, David B., Gibbons, Philip, Bourke, Max, Burgman, Mark, Dickman, Chris R., Ferrier, Simon, Fitzsimons, James, Freudenberger, David, Garnett, Stephen T., Groves, Craig, Hobbs, Richard J., Kingsford, Richard T., Krebs, Charles, Legge, Sarah, Lowe, Andrew J., McLean, Rob, Montambault, Jensen, Possingham, Hugh, Radford, Jim, Robinson, Doug, Smallbone, Lisa, Thomas, David, Varcoe, Tony, Vardon, Michael, Wardel, Glenda, Woinarski, John and Zerger, Andre (2012) Improving biodiversity monitoring. Austral Ecology, 37 3: 285-294. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Author Lindenmayer, David B.
Gibbons, Philip
Bourke, Max
Burgman, Mark
Dickman, Chris R.
Ferrier, Simon
Fitzsimons, James
Freudenberger, David
Garnett, Stephen T.
Groves, Craig
Hobbs, Richard J.
Kingsford, Richard T.
Krebs, Charles
Legge, Sarah
Lowe, Andrew J.
McLean, Rob
Montambault, Jensen
Possingham, Hugh
Radford, Jim
Robinson, Doug
Smallbone, Lisa
Thomas, David
Varcoe, Tony
Vardon, Michael
Wardel, Glenda
Woinarski, John
Zerger, Andre
Title Improving biodiversity monitoring
Journal name Austral Ecology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0307-692X
Publication date 2012-05
Year available 2011
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x
Volume 37
Issue 3
Start page 285
End page 294
Total pages 10
Place of publication Richmond, Vic., Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Collection year 2012
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Effective biodiversity monitoring is critical to evaluate, learn from, and ultimately improve conservation practice. Well conceived, designed and implemented monitoring of biodiversity should: (i) deliver information on trends in key aspects of biodiversity (e.g. population changes); (ii) provide early warning of problems that might otherwise be difficult or expensive to reverse; (iii) generate quantifiable evidence of conservation successes (e.g. species recovery following management) and conservation failures; (iv) highlight ways to make management more effective; and (v) provide information on return on conservation investment. The importance of effective biodiversity monitoring is widely recognized (e.g. Australian Biodiversity Strategy). Yet, while everyone thinks biodiversity monitoring is a good idea, this has not translated into a culture of sound biodiversity monitoring, or widespread use of monitoring data. We identify four barriers to more effective biodiversity monitoring in Australia. These are: (i) many conservation programmes have poorly articulated or vague objectives against which it is difficult to measure progress contributing to design and implementation problems; (ii) the case for long-term and sustained biodiversity monitoring is often poorly developed and/or articulated; (iii) there is often a lack of appropriate institutional support, co-ordination, and targeted funding for biodiversity monitoring; and (iv) there is often a lack of appropriate standards to guide monitoring activities and make data available from these programmes. To deal with these issues, we suggest that policy makers, resource managers and scientists better and more explicitly articulate the objectives of biodiversity monitoring and better demonstrate the case for greater investments in biodiversity monitoring. There is an urgent need for improved institutional support for biodiversity monitoring in Australia, for improved monitoring standards, and for improved archiving of, and access to, monitoring data. We suggest that more strategic financial, institutional and intellectual investments in monitoring will lead to more efficient use of the resources available for biodiversity conservation and ultimately better conservation outcomes.
Keyword Conservation effectiveness
Management intervention
National Biodiversity Strategy
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Article first published online: 31 OCT 2011

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2012 Collection
School of Biological Sciences Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 37 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 43 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 22 Mar 2012, 16:38:03 EST by Gail Walter on behalf of School of Biological Sciences