Nonaddictive instrumental drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses

Goudie, Andrew J., Gullo, Matthew J., Rose, Abigail K., Christiansen, Paul, Cole, Jonathan C., Field, Matt and Sumnall, Harry (2011) Nonaddictive instrumental drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 34 6: 314-315. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000719


Author Goudie, Andrew J.
Gullo, Matthew J.
Rose, Abigail K.
Christiansen, Paul
Cole, Jonathan C.
Field, Matt
Sumnall, Harry
Title Nonaddictive instrumental drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses
Journal name Behavioral And Brain Sciences   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0140-525X
1469-1825
Publication date 2011-12
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X11000719
Volume 34
Issue 6
Start page 314
End page 315
Total pages 2
Place of publication Cambridge, United Kingdom
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Collection year 2012
Language eng
Abstract The potential to instrumentalize drug use based upon the detection of very many different drug states undoubtedly exists, and such states may play a role in psychiatric and many other drug uses. Nevertheless, nonaddictive drug use is potentially more parsimoniously explained in terms of sensation seeking/impulsivity and drug expectations. Cultural factors also play a major role in nonaddictive drug use.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences -- Publications
Non HERDC
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 14 Mar 2012, 11:41:40 EST by Ms Dayna Smith on behalf of Centre for Youth Substance Abuse