A randomised control trial of short term efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses compared to a wait and see policy for anterior knee pain and the role of foot mobility

Mills, Kathryn, Blanch, Peter, Dev, Priya, Martin, Michael and Vicenzino, Bill (2012) A randomised control trial of short term efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses compared to a wait and see policy for anterior knee pain and the role of foot mobility. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46 4: 247-252.


Author Mills, Kathryn
Blanch, Peter
Dev, Priya
Martin, Michael
Vicenzino, Bill
Title A randomised control trial of short term efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses compared to a wait and see policy for anterior knee pain and the role of foot mobility
Journal name British Journal of Sports Medicine  (ERA 2012 Listed)    (ERA 2010 Rank A)   Check publisher's open access policy
Publication date 2012-03
Sub-type Article
Year available 2011
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090204
Volume number 46
Issue number 4
ISSN 0306-3674; 1473-0480
Start page 247
End page 252
Total pages 6
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publisher B M J Group
Collection year 2012
Language eng
Formatted abstract Objectives:
To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses over a wait-and-see policy in the treatment of anterior knee pain (AKP) and evaluate the ability of foot posture measures to predict outcome. Design: Single-blind, randomised control trial.

Participants:
Forty participants (18-40 years) with clinically diagnosed AKP of greater than 6-week duration, who had not been treated with orthoses in the previous 5 years. Intervention: Prefabricated orthoses perceived as most comfortable from a selection of 3 different hardness values compared with a wait-and-see control group. Outcome measures: Participant-perceived global improvement, Kujala Patellofemoral Score, usual and worst pain severity over the previous week and the Patient Specific Functional Scale measures at 6 weeks.

Results:

Foot orthoses produced a significant global improvement compared with the control group (p = 0.008, relative risk reduction = 8.47%, numbers needed to treat = 2). Significant differences also occurred in measures of function (standardised mean difference = 0.71). Within the intervention group, individuals who exhibited a change in midfoot width from weight bearing to non-weight bearing of >11.25 mm were more likely to report a successful outcome (correct classification 77.8%).

Conclusion:
This is the first study to show orthoses provide greater improvements in AKP than a wait-and-see approach. Individuals with greater midfoot mobility are more likely to experience success from treatment. Trial Registration: ACTRN12611000492954.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Published Online First 18 September 2011.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article
Collections: Official 2012 Collection
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 51 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 23 Nov 2011, 10:42:22 EST by Ms Kerry Mellifont on behalf of School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences