Reference vs. present-day condition: Early planning decisions influence the achievement of conservation objectives

Hermoso, V., Januchowski-Hartley, S., Linke, S. and Possingham, H. P. (2011) Reference vs. present-day condition: Early planning decisions influence the achievement of conservation objectives. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 21 6: 500-509. doi:10.1002/aqc.1211


Author Hermoso, V.
Januchowski-Hartley, S.
Linke, S.
Possingham, H. P.
Title Reference vs. present-day condition: Early planning decisions influence the achievement of conservation objectives
Journal name Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1052-7613
1099-0755
Publication date 2011-09
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1002/aqc.1211
Volume 21
Issue 6
Start page 500
End page 509
Total pages 10
Place of publication Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Collection year 2012
Language eng
Formatted abstract
1. A vast scientific literature has been devoted to identifying the best way to represent biodiversity for conservation in the last decade. Methods exist for deciding how to use scarce information and avoid omission and commission errors. The effect of these errors on reserve efficiency does not arise only from the accuracy of data representing conservation features, as usually considered. There are also several underlying assumptions associated with the type of data used that might affect accuracy of conservation decision-making and compromise achievement of conservation objectives.
2. Here the effects of two management scenarios on selection of priority areas for conservation are explored. The spatial distribution of 10 native freshwater fish species in an Iberian basin under present-day and reference conditions were modelled and priority areas for both scenarios using the same spatial and cost constraints were identified.
3. Priority areas identified under the present-day scenario reflected the up-to-date spatial distribution of species and avoided the selection of highly perturbed and costly areas. The isolated spatial distribution of native populations imposed by the current perturbation status limited the spatial connectivity between priority areas under the present-day scenario. Most importantly for the achievement of conservation objectives, priority areas selected under both scenarios did not overlap.
4. Given that the reference scenario was based on potential presence of native species the actual representation of species would be overestimated if consideration were not given to restoring reference conditions (high commission errors). Based on results obtained it is recommended that planners give more consideration to the current perturbation status when identifying priority areas for conservation.
Keyword Commission and omission error
Freshwater ecosystems
Conservation
Rehabilitation
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2012 Collection
School of Biological Sciences Publications
Ecology Centre Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 16 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 16 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 23 Oct 2011, 00:10:36 EST by System User on behalf of School of Biological Sciences