Smaller aortic dimensions do not fully account for the greater pulse pressure in elderly female hypertensives

Dart, Anthony M., Kingwell, Bronwyn A., Gatzka, Christoph D., Willson, Kristyn, Liang, Yu-Lu, Berry, Karen L., Wing, Lindon M. H., Reid, Christopher M., Ryan, Philip, Beilin, Lawrence J., Jennings, Garry L. R., Johnston, Colin I., McNeil, John J., MacDonald, Graham J., Morgan, Trefor O., West, Malcolm J. and Cameron, James D. (2008) Smaller aortic dimensions do not fully account for the greater pulse pressure in elderly female hypertensives. Hypertension, 51 4: 1129-1134. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.106310


Author Dart, Anthony M.
Kingwell, Bronwyn A.
Gatzka, Christoph D.
Willson, Kristyn
Liang, Yu-Lu
Berry, Karen L.
Wing, Lindon M. H.
Reid, Christopher M.
Ryan, Philip
Beilin, Lawrence J.
Jennings, Garry L. R.
Johnston, Colin I.
McNeil, John J.
MacDonald, Graham J.
Morgan, Trefor O.
West, Malcolm J.
Cameron, James D.
Title Smaller aortic dimensions do not fully account for the greater pulse pressure in elderly female hypertensives
Journal name Hypertension   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0194-911X
1524-4563
Publication date 2008-04
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.106310
Volume 51
Issue 4
Start page 1129
End page 1134
Total pages 6
Place of publication Philadelphia, PA, United States
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Language eng
Formatted abstract
This study examined the importance of aortic dimensions in determining pulse pressure in elderly hypertensives participating in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study, including a substantial number not previously receiving blood pressure lowering medication. Aortic dimensions were determined by ultrasound at the transverse arch and at the insertion of the aortic valve. Unadjusted data showed negative (P<0.001) correlations between central (carotid) and (brachial) peripheral pulse pressure and both arch (—0.200, —0.181) and outflow tract (—0.238, —0.238) diameters. Correlations were similar in those previously treated with blood pressure lowering medication and in the treatment naïve. Central pulse pressure (84±26 versus 75±28 mm Hg, P<0.001) was higher and aortic dimensions (transverse arch 2.56±0.31 versus 2.88±0.35 mm, P<0.001) smaller in women than men. Women had greater aortic stiffness (beta index 29.4±36.1 versus 22.1±21.3, P<0.03). Other bivariate correlates of central pulse pressure were age, mean arterial pressure, height, heart rate, augmentation index, aortic stiffness (all P<0.001), and weight (P<0.027). In multivariate analyses gender remained a predictor of central pulse pressure (P<0.001) even with inclusion of aortic dimensions (P<0.013) height and weight. Other significant terms were age, heart rate, mean blood pressure, and aortic stiffness (all P<0.001). These findings demonstrate an independent inverse relation between aortic size and pulse pressure in older hypertensive subjects. Differences in aortic dimensions and stiffness between genders do not fully account for the observed blood pressure differences, suggesting that a contributory factor to gender differences in pulse pressure is an increased age-related mismatch in ventricular function and aortic stiffness in women compared with men.
Keyword Blood pressure
Elderly
Risk factors
Aortic stiffness
Gender
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: ERA 2012 Admin Only
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 21 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 25 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 09 Sep 2011, 00:05:44 EST by System User on behalf of Medicine - Prince Charles Hospital