Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate

Payero, Jose O., Melvin, Steven R., Irmak, Suat and Tarkalson, David (2006) Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management, 84 1-2: 101-112.


Author Payero, Jose O.
Melvin, Steven R.
Irmak, Suat
Tarkalson, David
Title Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate
Journal name Agricultural Water Management   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0378-3774
1873-2283
Publication date 2006-07-16
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.01.009
Volume 84
Issue 1-2
Start page 101
End page 112
Total pages 12
Place of publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier BV
Language eng
Formatted abstract Irrigation water supplies are decreasing in many areas of the US Great Plains, which is requiring many farmers to consider deficit-irrigating corn (Zea mays L.) or growing crops like winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that require less water, but that are less profitable. The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify the yield response of corn to deficit irrigation, and (2) determine which of several seasonal water variables correlated best to corn yield in a semiarid climate. Eight (T1–T8) and nine (T1–T9) deficit-irrigated treatments (including dryland), were compared in 2003 and 2004 in North Platte, Nebraska. The actual seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ETd) (calculated with procedures in FAO-56) for the different treatments was 37–79% in 2003 and 63–91% in 2004 compared with the seasonal crop evapotranspiration when water is not limited (ETw). Quantitative relationships between grain yield and several seasonal water variables were developed. Water variables included, irrigation (I), total water (Wall), rain + irrigation (WR+I), evaporation (E), crop evapotranspiration (ETd), crop transpiration (Td), and the ratios of ETd and Td to evapotranspiration and transpiration when water is not limited (ETw and Tw). Both years, yield increased linearly with seasonal irrigation, but the relationship varied from year to year. Combining data from both years, ETd had the best correlation to grain yield (yield = 0.028ETd–5.04, R2 = 0.95), and the water variables could be ranked from higher to lower R2 when related to grain yield as: ETd(R2=0.95)>Td(R2=0.93)>ETd/ETw(R2=0.90)=Td/Tw(R2=0.90)>Wall(R2=0.89)>E(R2=0.75)>WR+I(R2=0.65)>I(R2=0.06). Crop water productivity (CWP) (yield per unit ETd) linearly increased with ETd/ETw (R2 = 0.75), which suggests that trying to increase CWP by deficit-irrigating corn is not a good strategy under the conditions of this study.
Keyword Evapotranspiration
Deficit irrigation
Corn
Maize
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 60 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 77 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 27 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 10 Aug 2011, 08:48:53 EST by System User on behalf of Qld Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation