The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R as predictors of (C)AP skills and (C)APD

Wilson, Wayne J., Jackson, Alison, Pender, Alice, Rose, Carla, Wilson, Jacqueline, Heine, Chyrisse and Khan, Asad (2011) The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R as predictors of (C)AP skills and (C)APD. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54 1: 278-291. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0273


Author Wilson, Wayne J.
Jackson, Alison
Pender, Alice
Rose, Carla
Wilson, Jacqueline
Heine, Chyrisse
Khan, Asad
Title The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R as predictors of (C)AP skills and (C)APD
Journal name Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1092-4388
1558-9102
Publication date 2011-02
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0273
Volume 54
Issue 1
Start page 278
End page 291
Total pages 14
Place of publication Rockville, MD, United States
Publisher American Speech - Language - Hearing Association
Collection year 2012
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Purpose: In this study, the authors investigated the relationships between 3 tests used to screen for (central) auditory processing disorder ([C]APD)-the Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS; W. J. Smoski, M. A. Brunt,& J. C. Tannahill, 1998), the Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk (SIFTER; K. Anderson, 1989), and the Test of Auditory Perceptual Skills-Revised (TAPS-R; M. Y. Gardner, 1997)- and 4 tests used to diagnostically assess for (C)APD: Low-Pass Filtered Speech (LPFS), Competing Sentences (CS), Two-Pair Dichotic Digits (DD), and Frequency Patterns With Linguistic Report (FP).
Method: The screening and diagnostic (C)APD tests results of 104 children (71 boys, 33 girls) aged 6.9-14.3 years were reviewed following their attendance at a university clinic in Brisbane, Australia.
Results: Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient analysis showed weak (r = .22, p < .05) to moderate (r = .47, p < .01) correlations predominantly between the short-term and working memory test results of the TAPS-R and the DD and FP test results of the (C)AP test battery. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses showed a poor ability of the CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R test results to predict the individual LPFS, CS, DD, or FP test results or the overall risk for (C)APD.
Conclusion: The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS-R should be used to highlight concerns about a child but not to determine whether a diagnostic (C)AP assessment is particularly warranted.
Keyword (Central) auditory processing disorder
Screening
Diagnosis
Attention
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2012 Collection
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 14 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 20 Mar 2011, 00:08:10 EST