Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery

Beck, David E., Harford, Francis J. and DiPalm, Jack A. (1985) Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 28 7: 491-495. doi:10.1007/BF02554091


Author Beck, David E.
Harford, Francis J.
DiPalm, Jack A.
Title Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery
Journal name Diseases of the Colon and Rectum   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0012-3706
1530-0358
Publication date 1985
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1007/BF02554091
Volume 28
Issue 7
Start page 491
End page 495
Total pages 5
Place of publication New York, NY, United States
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Golytely®, an oral gut lavage solution, was compared with a standard bowel cleansing preparation in patients undergoing elective colonic surgery. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to either a one-day preparation with Golytely and bisacodyl or a standard method using a three-day clear liquid diet, cathartics, and enemas. Colon cleansing was better with Golytely (100 percent optimal cleansing vs. 64 percent,P<0.05). Patients receiving Golytely had less weight loss and found this preparation more tolerable. Quantitative stool cultures before and after preparation and intraoperatively were not significantly different between the two preparations. In this surgical bowel preparation study, Golytely and Bisacodyl were found to be safe, rapid, and effective. The preparation was well tolerated by patients and has become our preferred method of colonic cleansing.
Keyword Golytely®
Colonic cleansing
Bowel preparation
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Non-UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collection: School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 44 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 42 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 14 Mar 2011, 08:46:04 EST