An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals

Phillips, Clive, Izmirli, Serdar, Aldavood, Javid, Alonso, Marta, Choe, Bi, Hanlon, Alison, Handziska, Anastasija, Illmann, Gudrun, Keeling, Linda, Kennedy, Mark, Lee, Gwi, Lund, Vonne, Mejdell, Cecilie, Pelagic, Veselinas and Rehn, Therese (2010) An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals. Animals, 1 1: 7-26. doi:10.3390/ani1010007

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
phillipspdf.pdf phillipspdf.pdf application/pdf 147.81KB 3

Author Phillips, Clive
Izmirli, Serdar
Aldavood, Javid
Alonso, Marta
Choe, Bi
Hanlon, Alison
Handziska, Anastasija
Illmann, Gudrun
Keeling, Linda
Kennedy, Mark
Lee, Gwi
Lund, Vonne
Mejdell, Cecilie
Pelagic, Veselinas
Rehn, Therese
Title An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals
Journal name Animals   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 2076-2615
Publication date 2010-12-09
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.3390/ani1010007
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 1
Issue 1
Start page 7
End page 26
Total pages 20
Place of publication Basel, Switzerland
Publisher MDPI Publishing
Collection year 2011
Language eng
Abstract Previous research has demonstrated that in households where the male partner is more dominant, there is convergence in male and female attitudes towards animals, whereas if the female partner is empowered they exhibit greater empathy towards animals than the male partner. We tested this theory of ‘female empowered empathy’ internationally in a survey of female and male students’ attitudes towards use of animals, conducted in 11 Eurasian countries: China, Czech Republic, Great Britain, Iran, Ireland, South Korea, Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Spain and Sweden. Gender empowerment was estimated for each country using the Gender Empowerment Measure designed by the United Nations. The survey was administered via the internet in universities within countries, and 1,902 female and 1,530 male student responses from 102 universities were received. Respondents rated the acceptability of 43 major concerns about human use of animals, and the importance of 13 world social issues, including animal protection, environmental protection and sustainable development. Females had greater concern for animal welfare and rights than males. There was a positive correlation between the Gender Empowerment Measure and the ratio of female to male concern for animal welfare and rights, but not for other world issues. Thus in countries where females were more empowered, principally Sweden, Norway and Great Britain, females had much greater concern than males for animal issues, whereas in other countries the responses of males and females were more similar. Across countries female students were more likely to avoid meat and less likely to avoid eggs, milk and seafood than male students, and were more likely to have kept pets than males. Females rated cats as more sentient than males did. The results demonstrate that females have greater concern for animal welfare and rights than males, and that this is more likely to be expressed in countries where females are relatively empowered, suggesting that ‘emancipated female empathy’ operates across countries as well as at a local level.
Keyword Animals
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Official 2011 Collection
School of Veterinary Science Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 20 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 08 Mar 2011, 15:44:17 EST by Annette Winter on behalf of School of Veterinary Science