The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections

Raymond, Christopher M., Brown, Gregory and Weber, Delene (2010) The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 4: 422-434. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002


Author Raymond, Christopher M.
Brown, Gregory
Weber, Delene
Title The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections
Journal name Journal of Environmental Psychology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0272-4944
1522-9610
Publication date 2010-12-01
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002
Volume 30
Issue 4
Start page 422
End page 434
Total pages 13
Editor R. Gifford
Place of publication Camden, London, U.K.
Publisher Academic Press
Collection year 2011
Language eng
Subject C1
Formatted abstract
Place attachment has been researched extensively in the social and behavioural sciences over the past two decades. However, it is challenging for researchers to assimilate the mixed messages presented in the place attachment literature and to understand the multiple place attachment terms. In this study, a four-dimensional model of rural landholder attachments to their natural resource management region was conceptually and empirically developed with the aim of developing an integrated approach to the measurement of place attachment that clearly distinguishes between different elements of place scholarship. A 29-item place attachment scale with the dimensions of place identity, place dependence, nature bonding, and social bonding was tested on a random sample of rural landholders in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges in South Australia (N = 320). The majority of respondents were male (69.3%) and the average age was 59 years. The scale was reduced to 20-items and then administered simultaneously and in the same response format to rural landholders in two other areas of South Australia: the Northern and Yorke region (N = 664) and South Australian Murray-Darling Basin region (N = 659). In both studies, the majority of respondents were male (85%) and the average age was 55 years. Exploratory factor and reliability analyses of Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges and Northern and Yorke datasets produced a five-dimensional model of place attachment with high reliabilities. Social bonding divided into the constructs of family bonding and friend bonding. The refined five-dimensional model was then examined for convergent validity, with moderate but significant correlations found between individual attachment constructs and dependent variables expected to be related to the construct, such as place identity and length of residence, and nature bonding and time currently spent in nature. We used confirmatory factor analysis to test the goodness-of-fit of the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin (SAMDB) dataset to the proposed five-dimensional model and then compared its fit to the traditional two-dimensional model of place identity and place dependence. The five-dimensional model provided moderate fit for the SAMDB data. We conclude with a discussion of the validity and reliability of the five-dimensional model and its future role in place attachment research.

Research highlights: ►In this study, a four-dimensional model of rural landholder attachments to their natural resource management region was conceptually and empirically developed with the goal of developing an integrated approach to the measurement of place attachment that clearly distinguishes between different elements of place scholarship. ►Our findings indicate that a five-dimensional model of place attachment comprising of place identity, dependence, nature bonding, family bonding, and friend bonding is a valid and reliable measure of rural landholder attachments to their natural resource management region. ►We argue that the attributes of the physical and social setting cannot be viewed in isolation of the highly personalized emotions formed in these settings which we refer to as the personal context to place attachment. ►Individual connection with place is not just a function of experience with nature or social interaction with friends and family in setting, but also how individuals construct their own identity through their residential and farming histories.
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword Sense of place
Place identity
Community attachment
Scale development
Place attachment
Construct validity
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management Publications
Official 2011 Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 77 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 102 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 09 Jan 2011, 10:05:35 EST