A call to context

Jordan, Peter J., Dasborough, Marie T., Daus, Catherine S. and Ashkanasy, Neal M. (2010) A call to context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3 2: 145-148. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01215.x

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ221652.pdf HERDC combined application/pdf 67.19KB 5

Author Jordan, Peter J.
Dasborough, Marie T.
Daus, Catherine S.
Ashkanasy, Neal M.
Title A call to context
Journal name Industrial and Organizational Psychology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1754-9426
Publication date 2010-06
Year available 2010
Sub-type Discussion - responses, round table/panel discussions, Q&A, reply
DOI 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01215.x
Volume 3
Issue 2
Start page 145
End page 148
Total pages 4
Place of publication Chichester, England ; New York
Publisher Wiley - Blackwell
Collection year 2011
Language eng
Abstract The novel format of IOP focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to science and practice in our field. The journal takes a focal article-peer commentary-response format. A focal article is a position paper on an important issue for the field (or potentially a pair of papers taking opposite sides in a debate). Such a focal article might summarize evidence on an issue and take a position as to implications for science, practice, or public policy. The paper might focus on a basic science issue, an applied science issue, a practice issue, or a public policy issue; many would be a blend. The focal article will be followed by a series of peer commentaries. These could challenge or critique the original article, expand on issues not addressed in the focal article, or draw out implications not developed in the focal article. The goal is to include commentaries from various perspectives, including science, practice, and international perspectives. These commentaries will be followed by a response from the original author of the focal paper.
Q-Index Code CX
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Reply to Cherniss (2010) Perspectives on Science and Practice Article first published online : 15 JUN 2010.

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Discussion - responses, round table/panel discussions, Q&A, reply
Collections: Non HERDC
UQ Business School Publications
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 18 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Fri, 19 Nov 2010, 12:54:06 EST by Karen Morgan on behalf of UQ Business School