The Politics of 'Sustainability': A Critical Discourse Analysis of Victorian Government Policy Discourse, 1999-2006

Brian Coffey (2010). The Politics of 'Sustainability': A Critical Discourse Analysis of Victorian Government Policy Discourse, 1999-2006 PhD Thesis, School of Social Work and Human Services, The University of Queensland.

       
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
s41025967_phd_abstract.pdf s41025967_phd_abstract.pdf Click to show the corresponding preview/stream application/pdf 41.75KB 6
s41025967_phd_totalthesis.pdf s41025967_phd_totalthesis.pdf Click to show the corresponding preview/stream application/pdf 1.54MB 34
Author Brian Coffey
Thesis Title The Politics of 'Sustainability': A Critical Discourse Analysis of Victorian Government Policy Discourse, 1999-2006
School, Centre or Institute School of Social Work and Human Services
Institution The University of Queensland
Publication date 2010-09
Thesis type PhD Thesis
Supervisor Greg Marston
Paul Henman
Total pages 240
Total black and white pages 240
Subjects 16 Studies in Human Society
Abstract/Summary Abstract Since its emergence during the 1980s the idea of sustainability has come to provide the dominant frame within which environmental policy is debated. Thus, for many ‘sustainability’ represents the best way to address the economic, social and environmental effects of the myriad of environmental issues facing human societies, including biodiversity loss, soil erosion, pollution of waterways, ozone depletion and climate change. There are however, widely divergent views advocated as to what sustainability means, which has important implications for how serious environmental issues are understood to be, why they are important, what has caused them, and what needs to be done to address them. Given the diversity of such views, the consequences for policy making, and the likelihood of effective responses being developed, are self evident. Within this context, this thesis investigates the politics of sustainability, focussing particularly on the way in which it is defined, because of the implications this has for the way in which environmental issues are understood and addressed. Following a review of various approaches to analysing environmental policy (traditional, mainstream, ecopolitical and discursive), Norman Fairclough’s approach to discourse analysis (Critical Discourse Analysis) was identified as having particular merit. Fairclough’s approach avoids the assumption that policy issues exist independently of the way they are framed and offers a perspective on discourse that links the social theoretical concerns of Foucault with the micro level concerns of linguistics. It also provides a means for taking environmental policy analysis in directions that that have attracted relatively limited attraction, namely the detailed analysis of the ideological effects of language on environmental policy. In this thesis Fairclough’s approach is used to explore how three storylines of sustainability (sustainable development, environmentally sustainable growth and transforming society) and their associated discourses shaped environmental policy making in Victoria, Australia, between 1999 and 2006. In undertaking this analysis, I examined the political and institutional context informing policy making (social practice); the contested process of text production (discourse practice), and; the detailed wording of a policy text (textual analysis). A major policy statement on environmental sustainability released by the Victorian Government in 2005 is subjected to detailed analysis. Based on the analysis undertaken, the substantive finding from this research is that rather than moving beyond neoliberalism, the Victorian Government embraced an approach to sustainability that was informed by neoliberalism and (weak) ecological modernisation, which constructs sustainability in ways that limit its importance and constrain the types of responses that could be advocated. In doing so, it drew heavily on notions of natural assets and ecosystems services as ways to make sense of the environment and why it is important. The Victorian Government also highlighted that environmental issues are caused by the cumulative effects of individual choices, and emphasized the importance of individual choice and behavioural change as central features of sustainability, while restricting opportunities for more transformative ideas to be heard. The broader conclusion arising from this research is that approaches to environmental policy that rely on neoliberal and (weak) ecological modern discourses are flawed, because, in commodifying nature, limiting the nature and magnitude of change required, and placing responsibility onto individuals they offer a constrained understanding of the challenge of sustainability and what needs to be done about it. The overall contribution made by this research is an improved understanding of the discursive nature of the politics of sustainability and the influence of neoliberalism and ecological modernisation, the use of a methodology that has attracted relatively limited attention within environmental policy (despite its widespread use in other areas of policy) and the documentation of a period of significant environmental policy reform in Victoria.
Keyword Environmental policy
sustainability
Critical Discourse Analysis
ecological modernisation
neoliberalism
Victoria
Additional Notes The following pages are A4 landscape pages 30-31 of PDF version of thesis page 132 of pdf version of thesis page 164 of pdf version of thesis

 
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1107 Abstract Views, 48 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 30 Sep 2010, 17:18:21 EST by Mr Brian Coffey on behalf of Library - Information Access Service