Effectiveness of medical compared to multidisciplinary models of care for adult persons with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Strand, Haakan and Parker, Deborah (2010) Effectiveness of medical compared to multidisciplinary models of care for adult persons with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 8 26: 1058-1087.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Author Strand, Haakan
Parker, Deborah
Title Effectiveness of medical compared to multidisciplinary models of care for adult persons with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A systematic review
Journal name JBI Library of Systematic Reviews
ISSN 1838-2142
Publication date 2010-09
Sub-type Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Volume 8
Issue 26
Start page 1058
End page 1087
Total pages 30
Editor Dr Rick Wiechula
Place of publication Adelaide, SA, Australia
Publisher University of Adelaide * Faculty of Health Sciences
Collection year 2011
Language eng
Subject C1
920106 Endocrine Organs and Diseases (excl. Diabetes)
920210 Nursing
1110 Nursing
111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)
920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomes
Formatted abstract Aim: Multidisciplinary care is a model of care that has increased in popularity. It offers opportunities for different ways of providing care. The objective of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care on the progression of chronic kidney disease by adult pre-dialysis patients in comparison to traditional medical care.
Methods: Eleven databases were searched for material published between January 1990 to July 2009 and 37 search terms were used in different combinations. In addition, suitable journals and websites were searched as well as a hand search of reference lists in the retrieved hits from the database searches was used as well. Management tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute-Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument were used to assess the methodological quality of each of the retrieved articles that met the criteria for the review. Data extraction and synthesis was performed using the appropriate tool.
Results: From 927 hits only four articles were finally deemed suitable for inclusion in the systematic review. Two reported the results of randomised controlled trials and the remaining two were observational studies. The data was not presented in a format that allowed a meta-analysis to be performed. One article (from 1998) argued that multidisciplinary care was not cost effective and in this study there was no difference in outcomes between multidisciplinary care and traditional care. The other three articles showed a positive impact on patient well being and outcomes for those receiving multidisciplinary care, such as delay in the progression of their chronic kidney disease. Education of patients was shown to have a significant effect on the delay in time for patients initiating renal replacement therapy whether as peritoneal-dialysis, haemo-dialysis or transplantation. None of the articles reported negative effects, reduced safety or poor outcomes for the patients receiving multidisciplinary care. Well controlled blood pressure, within treatment targets, appears to be an important factor in delaying the progression of their chronic kidney disease, although this did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion: Multidisciplinary care is deemed to be effective for adults with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease. The effectiveness is shown as a delay in time to initiation of renal replacement therapy. Education is an important component that should be included in a multidisciplinary model of care. The education should in particular aim to increase the knowledge and understanding of the causes of ill health for people with chronic kidney disease.
Implications for Practice: The results from the systematic review support the implementation of multidisciplinary clinics like chronic kidney disease clinics as a way to delay progression of chronic kidney disease. This model of care often includes each member of the multidisciplinary team educating the patient in their area of expertise while the nephrologists or a nurse practitioner regularly reviews and creates a management plan jointly with the patient.
Implications for Research: Further research needs to be conducted on the best models of education for this population, including who is ideally suited to provide the education. As none of the studies reviewed multidisciplinary care in Australian chronic kidney disease clinics, this needs to be further assessed regarding patient outcomes and wellbeing. Other outcomes of interest that require further research are the safety and cost effectiveness of multidisciplinary care as well as patients’ experiences of the care and possible impacts on their independence. At present there is limited research published in this area, particularly in an Australian context. © the authors 2010
Keyword Chronic kidney disease
CKD
Multidisciplinary Care
MDC
Pre-dialysis
Systematic review
References 1. AIHW, Tong B, Stevenson C. Comorbidity of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2007. Report No.: Cat. no. CVD 37. 2. DOHA N. National Chronic Disease Strategy. In: Ageing AGDoHa, editor. Canberra: AIHW; 2006. 3. Patel SS, Kimmel PL, Singh A. New clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: a framework for K/DOQI. Semin Nephrol. [Journal Article Review]. 2002 2002 Nov;22(6):449-58. 4. Meguid El Nahas A, Bello AK. Chronic kidney disease: the global challenge. Lancet. [Journal Article Review]. 2005 2005 Jan 22-28 DTBS- Local Disk MEDLINE;365(9456):331-40. 5. AIHW. Chronic kidney disease in Australia. In: Welfare AIoHa, editor. Canberra: Australian Government; 2005. 6. Chadban SJ, Briganti EM, Kerr PG, Dunstan DW, Welborn TA, Zimmet PZ, et al. Prevalence of kidney damage in Australian adults: The AusDiab kidney study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. [Journal Article Research Support Non-U S Gov't ]. 2003 2003 Jul DTBS- Local Disk MEDLINE;14(7 Suppl 2):S131-8. 7. Jafar TH, Stark PC, Schmid CH, Landa M, Maschio G, de Jong PE, et al. Progression of chronic kidney disease: the role of blood pressure control, proteinuria, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a patient-level meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):244-52. 8. AIHW. An overview of chronic kidney disease in Australia, 20009. . Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Welfare AIoHa;2009. Report No.: Cat.no. PHE 111. 9. AIHW. Outline of the National Centre for Monitoring Chronic Kidney Disease. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2009. Report No.: Cat. no PHE108. 10. AIHW. Indicators for chronic disease and their determinants 2008. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Wellfare2008. Report No.: Cat PHE 75. 11. AIHW. Prevention of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease: targeting risk factors. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2009. Report No.: PHE118. 12. Barri YM. Hypertension and kidney disease: a deadly connection. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2008 Feb;10(1):39-45. 13. Kidney Health Australia. Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD) Management in General Practice. Kidney Health Australia. Melbourne 2007. 14. Stengel B, Tarver-Carr ME, Powe NR, Eberhardt MS, Brancati FL. Lifestyle factors, obesity and the risk of chronic kidney disease. Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):479-87. 15. Kidney Health Australia. Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD) Management in General Practice. Kidney Health Australia. Melbourne 2010. 16. Perlman RL, Finkelstein FO, Liu L, Roys E, Kiser M, Eisele G, et al. Quality of life in chronic kidney disease (CKD): a cross-sectional analysis in the Renal Research Institute-CKD study. Am J Kidney Dis. [Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support Non-U S Gov't ]. 2005 2005 Apr;45(4):658-66. 17. McCarley PB, Salai PB. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: recognizing and reducing the risk of a common CKD comorbidity. Am J Nurs. [Journal Article Review ]. 2005 2005 Apr DTBS- Local Disk MEDLINE;105(4):40-52; quiz 3. 18. Drawz P, Rahman M. In the clinic. Chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):ITC2-1-15; quiz ITC2-6. 19. Queensland Government. Queensland Statewide Renal Health Services Plan, 2008–17, Part One: The Way Forward. Brisbane Queensland Government; 2007. p. 1- 84. 20. Queensland Health. Queensland Strategy for Chronic Diseases 2005 - 2015. Brisbane2005. 21. Minutolo R, De Nicola L, Mazzaglia G, Postorino M, Cricelli C, Mantovani LG, et al. Detection and Awareness of Moderate to Advanced CKD by Primary Care Practitioners: A Cross-sectional Study From Italy. Am J Kidney Dis. [Journal article]. 2008 2008 May 10;0(0):0. 22. Curtis BM, Barrett BJ, Djurdjev O, Singer J, Levin A. Evaluation and treatment of CKD patients before and at their first nephrologist encounter in Canada. Am J Kidney Dis. [Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support Non-U S Gov't]. 2007 2007 Nov;50(5):733-42. 23. Ahmed A. Quality and outcomes of heart failure care in older adults: role of multidisciplinary disease-management programs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Sep;50(9):1590-3. 24. Nuovo J. Chronic disease management. New York, NY :: Springer; 2007. 25. Sciamanna CN, Alvarez K, Miller J, Gary T, Bowen M. Attitudes toward nurse practitioner-led chronic disease management to improve outpatient quality of care. Am J Med Qual. [Journal Article]. 2006 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):375-81. 26. Litaker D, Mion L, Planavsky L, Kippes C, Mehta N, Frolkis J. Physician - nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care. J Interprof Care. 2003 Aug;17(3):223-37. 27. Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, Totten AM, Tsai WY, Cleary PD, et al. Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):59-68. 28. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Jr., Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999 Jan;37(1):5-14. 29. Lee W, Campoy S, Smits G, Vu Tran Z, Chonchol M. Effectiveness of a chronic kidney disease clinic in achieving K/DOQI guideline targets at initiation of dialysis--a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. [Journal Article]. 2007 2007 Mar;22(3):833-8. 30. Costantini L, Beanlands H, McCay E, Cattran D, Hladunewich M, Francis D. The self-management experience of people with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Nurs J. [Journal Article Research Support Non-U S Gov't]. 2008 2008 Mar-Apr;35(2):147-55; quiz 56. 31. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). [Journal Article Research Support Non-U S Gov't ]. 2001 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78. 32. Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ. [Journal Article Research Support Non-U S Gov't Review]. 2002 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):819-23. 33. Devins GM, Mendelssohn DC, Barre PE, Binik YM. Predialysis psycho educational intervention and coping styles influence time to dialysis in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Oct;42(4):693-703. 34. Thanamayooran S, Rose C, Hirsch DJ. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary kidney disease clinic in achieving treatment guideline targets. Nephrol Dial Transplant. [Comparative Study Journal Article ]. 2005 2005 Nov;20(11):2385-93. 35. Harris LE, Luft FC, Rudy DW, Kesterson JG, Tierney WM. Effects of multidisciplinary case management in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Med. 1998 Dec;105(6):464-71. 36. Richards N, Harris K, Whitfield M, O'Donoghue D, Lewis R, Mansell M, et al. Primary care-based disease management of chronic kidney disease (CKD), based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting, improves patient outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Feb;23(2):549-55. 37. Wrone EM, Hornberger J. Evaluating the consequences of multidisciplinary case management for patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Med. 1998 Dec;105(6):546-8. 38. AIHW. Chronic diseases and participation in work. . Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare2009. Report No.: Cat. no PHE109. 39. Curtin RB, Walters BA, Schatell D, Pennell P, Wise M, Klicko K. Self-efficacy and self-management behaviors in patients with chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. [Journal Article Research Support Non-U S Gov't]. 2008 2008 Apr;15(2):191-205.
Q-Index Code CX
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Critical review of research, literature review, critical commentary
Collections: Non HERDC
School of Nursing and Midwifery Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 375 Abstract Views, 5 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 30 Sep 2010, 13:47:08 EST by Vicki Percival on behalf of School of Nursing and Midwifery