Which bibliographic databases best serve palliative care? - An empirical analysis

Whan, Peter J. (2003). Which bibliographic databases best serve palliative care? - An empirical analysis. In: Abstracts of the 8th Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) - Résumés du 8ème Congrès de l’Association Européenne de Soins Palliatifs. 8th Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), The Hague, Netherlands, (103-103). 2-5 April 2003.

Author Whan, Peter J.
Title of paper Which bibliographic databases best serve palliative care? - An empirical analysis
Formatted title
Which bibliographic databases best serve palliative care? – An empirical analysis
Conference name 8th Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)
Conference location The Hague, Netherlands
Conference dates 2-5 April 2003
Proceedings title Abstracts of the 8th Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) - Résumés du 8ème Congrès de l’Association Européenne de Soins Palliatifs
Place of Publication Newmarket, U. K.
Publisher Hayward Medical Communications
Publication Year 2003
Sub-type Oral presentation
Start page 103
End page 103
Total pages 1
Language eng
fre
Formatted Abstract/Summary
Aim
Bibliographic databases available publicly and through a large university library were analysed to determine their usefulness to Palliative Care workers.

Conclusion
The AMED database provides the widest coverage of Palliative Care journals, while MEDLINE provides reasonable coverage at no cost if accessed as PubMed via the internet.
Subjects 1110 Nursing
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Q-Index Code EX
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Tue, 02 Mar 2010, 21:41:03 EST by Jon Swabey on behalf of Faculty Of Health Sciences