An urgent call to implement systematic monitoring of a comprehensive set of quality indicators for maternity services

Bogossian, Fiona E. (2009) An urgent call to implement systematic monitoring of a comprehensive set of quality indicators for maternity services. Women and Birth, 23 1: 36-40. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2009.11.001


Author Bogossian, Fiona E.
Title An urgent call to implement systematic monitoring of a comprehensive set of quality indicators for maternity services
Journal name Women and Birth   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1871-5192
Publication date 2009-12-16
Year available 2009
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2009.11.001
Volume 23
Issue 1
Start page 36
End page 40
Total pages 5
Editor Kathleen Fahy
Place of publication Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier BV
Collection year 2010
Language eng
Subject C1
9202 Health and Support Services
111006 Midwifery
Abstract This commentary paper proposes that historically the lack of significant system wide reform of the sector may be in part related to the quality of evidence that has informed reviews of maternity services. It calls for the implementation of systematic monitoring of a comprehensive set of quality indicators and makes suggestions about how this goal might be achieved.
Keyword maternity reform
maternity review cycle
consumer-assessed value
performance indicators
perinatal outcomes
References 1. Commonwealth of Australia. Improving maternity services in Australia: a discussion paper from the Australian Government; 2009. 2. Hirst C. Re-birthing report of the review of maternity services in Queensland. Brisbane; 2005. 3. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Disease 1979;32:51—63. 4. Queensland Health. Perinatal statistics Queensland 2006. Brisbane: Queensland Government 2008; March 2008. Contract No.: 9th October. 5. Lancaster P, Huang J, Pedisich E. Australia’s mothers and babies 1991. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 1994. 6. Kildea S, Pollock W, Barclay L. Making pregnancy safer in Australia: the importance of maternal death review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008; 48:130—6. 7. Duckett S, Ward M. Developing ‘robust performance benchmarks’ for the next Australian Health Care Agreement: the need for a new framework. Australian and New Zealand Health Policy 2008;5(1). 8. Brown S, Lumley J. The 1993 survey of recent mothers: issues in survey design, analysis and influencing policy. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1997;9(4):265—75. 9. Queensland Government. Post-birth consumer survey 2006; 2006. 10. Queensland Government. Post birth consumer survey 2006. Technical report. Brisbane: Office of Economic and Statistical Research; 2007. 11. Queensland Government. 2006/07 patient satisfaction–—maternal birth survey; 2008. Available from: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/quality/pat_sat_survey/listening.asp [accessed 05.11.09]. 12. van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie A-M, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity satisfaction studies and thier limitations: ‘‘What is, must still be best’’. Birth 2003;30(2):75—81. 13. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Melani Christian L. Internet, amil and mixed mode surveys: the tailored design method. third ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. 14. Huntington A, Gilmour J, Schluter P, Tuckett A, Bogossian F, Turner C. The Internet as a research site: establishment of a web based longitudinal study of the nursing and midwifery workforce in three countries. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009;65(June (6)):1309—17. 15. Declercq E, Sakala C, Applebaum S, Risher P. Listening to mothers: report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Centre Association; 2002. 16. Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S. Listening to mothers II: report of the Second National Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2006. 17. Declercq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S. New mothers speak out: national survey results highlight women’s postpartum experiences. New York: Childbirth Connections; 2008. 18. Chalmers B, Dzakpasu S, Heamann M, Kaczorowski J, Szakacs H M. Conducting a national survey of women’s perinatal experiences in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2007;(July—August): 281—3. 19. Dzakpasu S, Chalmers B. Canadian maternity experiences pilot study. Birth 2005;32(1):34—8. 20. Public Health Agency of Canada. Maternity experiences survey (MES); 2007 [27th October 2008]. 21. Hundley V, Rennie A-M, Fitzmaurice A, Graham W, van Teijlingen E R, Penney G. A national survey of women’s views of their maternity care in Scotland. Midwifery 2000;16: 303—13. 22. Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C, Brocklehurst P. Recorded delivery: a national survey of women’s experiences of maternity care. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit 2006; 2007. 23. Bruinsma F, Brown S, Darcy M-A. Having a baby in Victoria 1989—2000: women’s views of public and private models of care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2002;27(1):20—6. 24. Dillman DA, Smyth JD. Design effects in the transition to web based surveys. American Journal of Preventive Medicine [Proceedings Paper] 2007 May;32(5):S90—6. 25. Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health. Maternity care matters an audit of maternity services in Scotland. Aberdeen: Dugald Baird Centre for Research on Women’s Health; 1999. 26. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. Victorian healthy mothers healthy families survey. Available from: http:// www.mcri.edu.au/Downloads/HMHF/MothersSurvey.pdf.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: 2010 Higher Education Research Data Collection
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Thu, 28 Jan 2010, 11:46:11 EST by Vicki Percival on behalf of School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work