Repeat upper limb botulinum toxin A injections: A reflection of clinical practice

Sakzewski, Leanne (2010) Repeat upper limb botulinum toxin A injections: A reflection of clinical practice. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52 1: 8-9. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03408.x


Author Sakzewski, Leanne
Title Repeat upper limb botulinum toxin A injections: A reflection of clinical practice
Journal name Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 0012-1622
1469-8749
0419-0238
Publication date 2010-01
Sub-type Editorial
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03408.x
Volume 52
Issue 1
Start page 8
End page 9
Total pages 2
Editor Peter Baxter
Hilary Hart
Place of publication London, U.K
Publisher Wiley Blackwell
Collection year 2011
Language eng
Formatted abstract
Management of upper limb spasticity in children with congenital hemiplegia has gained increased attention in the last decade owing to the impact of this type of spasticity on dayto- day functional activities and burden of care. Intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) to the upper limb forms part of the treatment repertoire adjunctive to upper limb training in the management of spasticity. Single dose injections to the upper limb have been reported in a number of randomized controlled trials. Results of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis indicated a small treatment effect favouring BoNT-A and upper limb training compared with upper limb training alone to improve unimanual capacity, and a moderate to strong treatment effect in the achievement of individualized outcomes for children with cerebral palsy. However, single dose BoNT-A and upper limb training does not accurately reflect current clinical practice as many children receive repeat injections over time.

Adverse events in response to BoNT-A for upper limb spasticity have been reported in both single and repeat dose studies, which were however, mild, short acting, and reversible.1 Limitations of the study by Olesch et al. and previous upper limb BoNT-A studies are the small sample size and brevity of follow-up. The meta-analysis addresses some of the issues around sample size; however, longer-term follow-up of efficacy and the long-term impact on muscle development are needed. Questions remain about the minimum dosage of therapy required to elicit a treatment effect, particularly relating to unimanual capacity and bimanual performance. Further exploration of the type of upper limb training coupled with BoNTA is required. A greater understanding of all of these factors can only lead to optimizing the investment of time and resources for both service providers and children with congenital hemiplegia.
Keyword Movement
Children
Q-Index Code CX
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code
Institutional Status UQ
Additional Notes Published under "Commentaries".

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Editorial
Collections: Non HERDC
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Sun, 10 Jan 2010, 00:07:34 EST