A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: An Australian case study

Sarker, Ashutosh, Ross, Helen and Shrestha, Krishna K. (2008) A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: An Australian case study. Ecological Economics, 68 1-2: 461-471.


Author Sarker, Ashutosh
Ross, Helen
Shrestha, Krishna K.
Title A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: An Australian case study
Journal name Ecological Economics  (ERA 2012 Listed)    (ERA 2010 Rank A)   Check publisher's open access policy
Publication date 2008-12
Sub-type Article
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.001
Volume number 68
Issue number 1-2
ISSN 0921-8009
Start page 461
End page 471
Total pages 11
Place of publication Amsterdam : Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier
Language eng
Subject 0908 Food Sciences
Abstract Water is perhaps one of the most studied types of common-pool resource (CPR) goods. Its quality, however, has not been discussed as much in the CPR literature as its quantity. We examine the significance of studying water quality from a CPR perspective, and then analyze implications for the formulation of institutional arrangements to improve water quality. We illustrate with a case study in South East Queensland, Australia. This involves a rural catchment (watershed) that contributes high sediment and some nutrient loads to the Brisbane River, where it affects urban water quality and visual amenity, water treatment costs, and dredging costs at the port. The pollutants then threaten marine water quality and habitat values for threatened species in Moreton Bay, a marine protected area. We analyze the potential for a CPR understanding to enhance the design and financing of a water quality management regime. Rather than seeking to supplant conceptualizations of externalities as a basis for design of policy instruments, we propose arrangements that combine the CPR and externality concepts to offer a powerful logic and financial basis for collective management. Market-based instruments could facilitate downstream populations to help pay for catchment restoration in return for enjoyment of improved water quality resulting from strengthened ecosystem services, while associated non-market-based instruments could help all parties understand and expand their roles under a common-pool management regime. We argue that recognition of CPR attributes provides a logic for cooperation and co-investment between stakeholders who are in a position to affect, or are affected by, water quality in different parts of a large river system.
Keyword Water quality
Common-pool resources
Ecosystem services
Collaborative management
Externality
Australia
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article
Collection: School of Agriculture and Food Sciences
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 7 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 7 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 178 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 03 Sep 2009, 09:12:39 EST by Mr Andrew Martlew on behalf of Faculty Of Nat Resources, Agric & Veterinary Sc