Attitudes of Australian Nurses to Information Technology in the Workplace: A national survey

Eley, Robert, Soar, Jeffrey, Buikstra, Elizabeth, Fallon, Tony and Hegney, Desley (2009) Attitudes of Australian Nurses to Information Technology in the Workplace: A national survey. Computers Informatics Nursing Journal, 27 2: 114-121.


Author Eley, Robert
Soar, Jeffrey
Buikstra, Elizabeth
Fallon, Tony
Hegney, Desley
Title Attitudes of Australian Nurses to Information Technology in the Workplace: A national survey
Journal name Computers Informatics Nursing Journal   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1538-2931
Publication date 2009-03
Year available 2009
Sub-type Article (original research)
DOI 10.1097/NCN.0b013e318197557e
Volume 27
Issue 2
Start page 114
End page 121
Total pages 8
Place of publication United States
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc
Collection year 2010
Language eng
Subject C1
920210 Nursing
110199 Medical Biochemistry and Metabolomics not elsewhere classified
320300 Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry
Abstract This article reports on the views of Australian nurses as to their use of computers in the workplace. Data were collected by questionnaires mailed to 10 000 members of the 150 000-member Australian Nursing Federation, which represents 60% of the Australian nursing workforce. The response rate was 43.3%. Computer use was 20% by assistants in nursing, rising to 75% by enrolled nurses and to more than 95% by RNs. Principal uses for the computers by the nurses were for access to patients' records and for internal communication. Most respondents (79%) agreed that the use of computers had improved information access. Only 9.4% considered that adoption of a national electronic health record would not be useful to healthcare. Fewer than 5% stated that they have no interest in computers, and 87% considered that their age was never or rarely a barrier to their use of the technology. However, not all aspects of computer introduction to nursing were positive. The proportions of respondents who considered that the use of computers had made their work easier, reduced duplication of data entry, and reduced errors in handing patient data were only 42%, 32%, and 31%, respectively. Results demonstrate a positive attitude toward information technology by Australian nurses but identify issues that must be addressed to support continued interest and engagement.
Keyword Australia
information technology
nurses' attitudes
nursing informatics
survey
References 1. Ayres D, Soar J, ConrickM. Health information systems. In: Conrick M, ed. Transforming Healthcare With Technology. Melbourne, Australia: Thompson/Social Science Press; 2006:197–211. 2. Gururajan R, Murugesan S, Soar J. Introducing mobile technologies in support of healthcare. J Inf Technol Manage. 2005;18(8): 12–18. 3. Joanna Briggs Institute. The evidence-based healthcare movement: overview and development. http://www.joannabriggs. edu.au/about/jbi_model.php. Accessed April 2, 2008. 4. Information and Communications Technology Standards Committee. Foundations for the Future, Priorities for Health Informatics Standardisation in Australia, 2005–2008. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2004. 5. Coiera EW. Health informatics. Med J Aust. 2002;176(1):20. 6. O’Farrell M. Bar codes urged to halt hospital errors. Irish Examiner. October 11, 2002. 7. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Concerns over medication errors in Australian hospitals [transcript]. The World Today. May 9, 2005. http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2005/ s1363139.htm. Accessed April 2, 2008. 8. Demirjian S, Chaczko Z, Hughes J. Information Technology and the Residential Aged Care Workforce National Survey Report. Sydney, Australia: DPS Publishing Pty Ltd; 2004. 9. Nursix. Nurses and NHS IT developments. Results of an online survey by Nursix.com. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0009/78714/003079.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2008. 10. Nursix. Nurses and NHS IT developments. Qualitative analysis results of an online survey by Nursix.com. http://www.rcn.org.uk/ __data/assets/pdf_file/0011/78635/002477.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2008. 11. Nursix. Nursix survey of nurses’ views on IT developments in the NHS. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/111552/ 003166.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2008. 12. Royal College of Nursing. The information needs of nurses. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/78670/ 002780.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2008. 13. Moody L, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses’ perception, attitudes and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337–344. 14. Dillon TW, Blankenship R, Crews TJ. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(3):139–145. 15. Schaper L, Pervan G. Exploring the links between technology acceptance and use and the attainment of individual and organisational goals: a case study in the community health sector. In: Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems; August 11–14, 2005; Omaha, NE. http://espace.lis. curtin.edu.au/archive/00000709/. Accessed April 2, 2008. 16. Webster J, Davis J, Holt V, Stallan G, New K, Yegdich T. Australian nurses and midwives knowledge of computers and their attitudes to using them in their practice. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 41(2):140–146. 17. Timmons S. Nurses resisting information technology. Nurs Inq. 2003;10(4):257–269. 18. Ho M, Hovenga E. What do Health Care Workers Have to Say About Information Technology in Their Workplace? In: Walker J, Whetton S, Wise M, Stark K, eds. HIC 1999. East Brunswick, Australia: Health Informatics Society of Australia; 1999:182–189. 19. Yu P, Comensoli N. An Exploration of the Barriers to the Adoption of Information Technology in Australian Aged Care Industry. In: Walduck K, Cesnik B, Chu S, eds. HIC 2004. East Brunswick, Australia: Health Informatics Society of Australia; 2004:127–131. 20. Curtis E, Hicks P, Redmond R. Nursing students experience and attitudes to computers: a survey of a cohort of students on a bachelor in nursing studies course. Inf Technol Nurs. 2002;14(2): 7–17. 21. Stricklin M, Bierer S, Struk C. Home care nurses’ attitudes toward computers: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Stronge and Brodt instrument. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(2):103–111. 22. Brumini G, Kovic I, Zombori D, Lulic I, Bilic-Zulle L, Petrovecki M. Comparisons of physicians’ and nurses’ attitudes towards computers. Stud Health Technol Info. 2005;116:608–613. 23. Ribeiro M, Lopes-Revista M. Measurement of Nurses and Physicians’ Attitudes Towards Computer Usage in the Age of Internet. Brazil: Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, SciELO; 2004. 24. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 8146.0-Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2004-05. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2005. 25. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1216.0 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2001. 26. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Nursing and Midwifery Labour Force 2006. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2006. 27. Richardson S, Martin B. The care of older Australians—a picture of residential the aged care workforce. Adelaide, Australia: The National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University; 2004. http:// www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/ageingworkforce-workforcerep.htm-copy2. AccessedMarch 26, 2008. 28. Flade R. Computers need to work for nurses, not the other way ’round. J Emerg Nurs. 2006;34(4):269. 29. Darbyshire P. User-friendliness of computerised information systems. Comput Nurs. 2000;18:93–99. 30. Edirippulige S. Australian nurses’ perceptions of e-health. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(5):266–268. 31. Yu P. Residential Aged Care Workers’ Computer Skill Sets and Attitudes Toward Using Information System to Manage Care. Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong; 2005. 32. Levy S. Attitudes to information technology: toys or tools? Nurs Stand. 1999;13(52):1–13.
Q-Index Code C1
Q-Index Status Confirmed Code

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: 2010 Higher Education Research Data Collection
School of Nursing and Midwifery Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article | Citations
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 138 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 05 May 2009, 13:27:15 EST by Vicki Percival on behalf of School of Nursing and Midwifery