Organizational culture and discourse

Alvesson, Mats (2004). Organizational culture and discourse. In David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick and Linda L. Putnam (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse (pp. 317-336) London, U. K.: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/978-1-84860-812-2.n15


Author Alvesson, Mats
Title of chapter Organizational culture and discourse
Title of book The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse
Place of Publication London, U. K.
Publisher Sage Publications
Publication Year 2004
Sub-type Research book chapter (original research)
DOI 10.4135/978-1-84860-812-2.n15
ISBN 9780761972259
0761972250
Editor David Grant
Cynthia Hardy
Cliff Oswick
Linda L. Putnam
Chapter number 14
Start page 317
End page 336
Total pages 20
Total chapters 20
Language eng
Subjects 1503 Business and Management
Formatted Abstract/Summary
Oranizational culture may, as organizational discourse analysis, mean many things and is very hard to delimit and specify. A lot of writings labelled 'organizational culture' share with discourse analysis a strong interest in language use in organizational settings, but many texts sidestep any theme related to language and focus on something else: behavior, minds, emotions, values, cognitions. Again, other authors are more vague on how they conceive language: more general notions of meanings, expressions or communications are used. As I see it, a cultural approach to organizations would be language-sensitive, but not necessarily language-focused.

This chapter contains a comparision between a cultural and a discursive approach. Very briefly, my point is that a cultural approach focuses more broadly on shared. moderately stable forms of meaning that are only partly verbalized. Culture concerns systems of meanings and symbolism involving take-for-granted elements in need of decyphering. Myths, basic assumptions about human nature, the environment, etc. are seldom directly espoused. They are partly non-conscious and occasionally 'language-distant', that is, not necessarily directly espoused, but call for reading between and behind the lines. A discursive understanding looks more specifically on language in use and views meaning as discursively constituted and typically as unstable. This understanding would call not so much for 'deeper' analysis, but for the identification and tracing of discourses and their efforts.
© Mats Alvesson 2004
Q-Index Code B1
Additional Notes Published in "Part III Discourses and Organizing"

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 08 Apr 2009, 20:57:38 EST by Maryanne Watson on behalf of UQ Business School