Evaluation of the ACRRM National Radiology Program for Australian rural and remote medical practitioners

Glazebrook, R., Chater, B., Graham, P., Kokar, G., Robinson, M., Escott, R., Putman, J. and Crosbie, D. (2005) Evaluation of the ACRRM National Radiology Program for Australian rural and remote medical practitioners. Rural & Remote Health, 5 3: 349-356.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UQ eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
UQ174047_OA.pdf Full text (open access) application/pdf 243.38KB 1
Author Glazebrook, R.
Chater, B.
Graham, P.
Kokar, G.
Robinson, M.
Escott, R.
Putman, J.
Crosbie, D.
Title Evaluation of the ACRRM National Radiology Program for Australian rural and remote medical practitioners
Journal name Rural & Remote Health   Check publisher's open access policy
ISSN 1445-6354
Publication date 2005
Sub-type Article (original research)
Open Access Status File (Publisher version)
Volume 5
Issue 3
Start page 349
End page 356
Total pages 8
Place of publication Carlton South, VIC, Australia
Publisher Deakin University
Language eng
Subject 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy
Formatted abstract
Introduction:
In 2000, the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) developed a national radiology quality assurance (QA) and continuing medical education (CME) program for rural and remote non-specialist Australian doctors. The program commenced on 1 January 2001. It required rural doctors to obtain 30 radiology QA/CME points over a 4 year period. At least 15-20 of these points had to be obtained by one of two mandatory options of the program, either: (1) film interpretation, report and review clinical audit activity; or (2) a radiology clinical attachment.

Method:

Doctors submitted their completed film review forms and clinical attachment logbooks to the program manager as confirmation of their educational activity to receive their professional development points. Data from film review forms and clinical attachment logbooks were de-identified and entered into two Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheets. The data were categorised and analysed in EXCEL.

Results:

From 1 January 2001 to September 2004, 823 rural and remote doctors enrolled in the ACRRM radiology program. This included 281 locums who enrolled in the short-term locum option of the program and 563 doctors who enrolled in the full program. In September 2004, 419 doctors had completed a radiology film review with a radiologist and 41 doctors completed a radiology clinical attachment in 31 different public and private radiology practices. One hundred and ninety-five doctors completed the short-term locum activity. Ninety-two different specialist radiologists participated in the program and assisted rural and remote doctors to enhance their radiology knowledge, confidence and skills. This article describes results from the two mandatory activities.

Conclusion:

The evaluation of the ACRRM radiology program after its first 3 years and 9 months shows there are a large number of rural and remote Australian doctors undertaking professional development and quality assurance activities in radiology.
Keyword Australia
continuing medical education
professional development
radiology education and quality assurance
rural and remote medical practitioners
Q-Index Code C1

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Article (original research)
Collections: Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
School of Medicine Publications
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Mon, 06 Apr 2009, 14:19:24 EST by Ms Julie Schofield on behalf of Library Corporate Services