User's guide to detecting misleading claims in research: discussion section helps redress the balance

Anuradha, S. (2005) User's guide to detecting misleading claims in research: discussion section helps redress the balance. BMJ, 330 7483: 145-145. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-a


Author Anuradha, S.
Title User's guide to detecting misleading claims in research: discussion section helps redress the balance
Journal name BMJ
ISSN 0959-8146
0959-8138
Publication date 2005-01
Sub-type Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
DOI 10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-a
Open Access Status DOI
Volume 330
Issue 7483
Start page 145
End page 145
Total pages 1
Place of publication London
Publisher British Medical Association
Language eng
Abstract Editor—Montori et al produce a users’ guide to detecting misleading claims in reports of clinical research.1 In the previous letter Penston raises objections to the proposal to read only the methods and results section and to bypass the discussion section, from a reader’s point of view. The implications of this for some authors of clinical research papers is also unnerving.
Q-Index Code CX
Q-Index Status Provisional Code
Institutional Status Unknown

Document type: Journal Article
Sub-type: Letter to editor, brief commentary or brief communication
Collections: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences -- Publications
Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) - Collection
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in Thomson Reuters Web of Science Article
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Created: Wed, 11 Mar 2009, 16:14:19 EST by Paul Rollo on behalf of Library Corporate Services